[net.followup] local telephone service

lauren@vortex.UUCP (Lauren Weinstein) (09/26/83)

Most areas of the U.S. still have "flat local" calling for
residential service, at least as an option, and usually as the 
"standard" residential service.  Of course, "local" areas aren't
very large in most major cities, where message units (or ZUM units)
have long been in use.  Some metro areas (NYC springs to
mind immediately) long charged 1 message unit for each local
call, regardless of duration, and with a certain allowance of
units included in the monthly bill.

Now, this is all changing rapidly.  Local telcos are filing proposed 
measured local service tariffs right and left.  The exact plans still vary
widely.  Some (at least for now) put a "cap" on the maximum amount you
could be charged for local calls, some will continue (once again, for now)
to offer flat rate residence service at a much higher cost.  Out here
in California, PacTel now publicly calls "flat rate" service "premium",
and "measured" service "standard" -- even though the overwhelming majority
of residential subscribers have flat rate service.  Doublethink in action --
just in time for 1984!  Both PacTel and GenTel have filed measured local
service tariffs -- PacTel including an (expensive) flat rate service
option (as a temporary measure, apparently) and GenTel, to date,
not offering such an option.  GenTel wants to start phasing in measured
local service around the end of either '84 or '85 -- I forget which.
They'd have to phase in -- since they can only efficiently track local
calls in areas where EAX/ESS machines have been installed -- and some
exchanges (and I know which ones!) aren't currently scheduled for 
cutover until close to 1990.

In any case, I wouldn't gloat too much up there in Canada.  The
articles I've seen in the Telco industry trade journals indicate that
Bell Canada and their friends have the same measured service plans
laid out for you as we're getting down here.  Good luck.

--Lauren--