[comp.sys.mac.misc] TidBITS Request for Comment on **Retrospect**

ace@tidbits.UUCP (Adam C. Engst) (05/29/91)

Greetings!

TidBITS is in the process of reviewing Retrospect from Dantz 
Development. In keeping with our philosophy of providing 
information to the people from the people (after all, who else 
knows better?), we and the readers of TidBITS would appreciate it 
if owners of Retrospect would complete the following short 
questionnaire. Any comments you have are also welcome, though we 
can't guarantee to reprint them. Unfortunately (or not, if you're 
shy or in hiding), we will not be able to list your name in the 
article due to space limitations.

Please respond whether or not you read TidBITS, and for those of 
you who do not read TidBITS currently, keep an eye out for review 
issues that will be appearing periodically. As with all TidBITS 
issues, they will be completely searchable and archivable, and 
they too will be issued in text-only format when we switch. And in 
case you aren't interested now, remember that sumex-
aim.stanford.edu and rascal.ics.utexas.edu both archive issues of 
TidBITS for you to retrieve later on when you may be more 
interested.

Thank you!

-----------------------------------
All questions are on a scale of 0 through 10, where 0 is mean, 
ugly, and nasty, and 10 is the ultimate in goodness and light (in 
poetry, we call it love and butterflies). Please only use integers 
(for you non-engineers, that means no decimals) since it makes the 
data entry much easier. If we were using a 5 point scale like 
MacUser's mice rating, then decimal mice would have to be 
acceptable, but we don't have to since we have a full 11 point 
scale (it starts at 0, like all good computer thingamabobs, and it 
gives us that extra little push when most surveys run out of 
steam. If you don't get the last joke, we highly recommend the 
movie "This Is Spinal Tap." You won't regret it.).

Please feel free to just return a mailfile that gives your rating 
next to the question number. We know what the questions are, and 
doing so will save you much hassle (and increase the probability 
of you responding). It also makes the data entry much easier on 
our part.

Send your answers to    ace@tidbits.tcnet.ithaca.ny.us
                  or    ace@tidbits.uucp
                  or    reply to this posting.


0. Please rate the ease of installation of the product. Confusing 
dialogs or "hand waving" that puts files in places you don't 
expect (or want) will lower the score. A simple Finder copy of the 
files accompanied by a reboot is nice and simple.

1. Please rate the ease of learning the product. It is good if you 
can jump right in and have everything react as you would expect. 
If you can't figure something out without referring to the manual 
immediately, the score goes down.

2. Please rate the ease of use once you've become familiar with 
the product. This is the score that will reflect most on the user 
interface. If the interface is clumsy and difficult to navigate 
even after you have learned the product, that's not good. If you 
find yourself wishing that other similar products were as clean, 
give the product a good score.

3. Please rate the power and usefulness of the product. If it does 
exactly what it claims to and doesn't leave you wishing you'd 
bought its main competitor, that rates highly. If on the other 
hand you feel stifled by the product, it's probably not so hot. 
Note that this is relative to other products as well. WriteNow 
isn't nearly as powerful as Nisus, but it doesn't have to be 
because they aren't in the same section of the word processor 
market. We can't be comparing oranges and golden apples.

4. Please rate the documentation. It should be well written, 
interesting to read, informative without being condescending, and 
concise without being too short. Every manual should have a 
complete table of contents and index; without them it is next to 
useless.

5. Please rate the company's technical support. If you haven't had 
to deal with tech support, great, but still give an answer. Things 
like 24 hour toll-free telephone support with next day replacement 
by an apologetic CEO are good. Low scores should be given to 
companies whose pay-per-minute tech support line is staffed by 
people who answer the phone with "What's your beef, moron?"

6. Please rate the product as a whole (still on the 0 to 10 
scale). Things such as your subjective feel of the usability of 
the product, the price and frequency of upgrades, and how upset 
you would be if you couldn't have the product anymore all affect 
this score.

7. If you wish, any written comments will also be appreciated. The 
best and most interesting of them will be included in the review.

Many thanks for all your help!

Adam C. Engst & Tonya Byard, TidBITS Editors

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adam C. Engst    Editor of TidBITS, the weekly electronic Macintosh journal

ace@tidbits.tcnet.ithaca.ny.us           The best way to predict the future
pv9y@crnlvax5, pv9y@vax5.cit.cornell.edu       is to invent it.   -Alan Kay