[net.bugs.4bsd] On-line manual references to environment variables

dave@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Sherman) (09/21/83)

Since time immemorial, UNIX manual pages have had a "FILES" section
which summarized, in one easily found spot, what files a program uses.

I would like to see a simlar "VARIABLES" section. A complicated
program (take readnews or sh, for example) uses many environment variables.
It would be nice if every UNIX manual page had a brief summary, at
the end, of all of the environment variables which the program looks
at.

Anybody listening out there at Bell or Berkeley?

Dave Sherman
-- 
 {cornell,decvax,ihnp4,linus,utzoo,uw-beaver}!utcsrgv!lsuc!dave

samir@drufl.UUCP (09/22/83)

I second Dave Sherman's suggestion.

					Samir Shah
					drufl!samir
					AT&T Information Systems, Denver

geo@watarts.UUCP (09/26/83)

I think this new section of manual pages, which describes what
environment variables the programme expects would be better named
"ENVIRONMENT", than the "VARIABLES", which Dave Sherman suggests.

	Cordially, Geo Swan, Integrated Studies, University of Waterloo
	(allegra||ihnp4)!watmath!watarts!geo

rcj@burl.UUCP (R. Curtis Jackson) (09/30/83)

The good folks who wrote esh, if you have never had occasion to see
it or its documentation, allow the user to set single-letter
shell variables and then bring the contents of those variables
onto the command line with <esc>x, where x is the single-character
name of a shell variable.  GREAT stuff, and VERY useful; I am very
sure and not being sarcastic.

HOWEVER, if you try to do something stupid like 'man tail' or
'uuto file grock!foo', you will get the strangest messages!!
It seems that man and uuto are shells which utilize several
single-character variables each........

*sigh*, what will they think of next?
-- 

The MAD Programmer -- 919-228-3814 (Cornet 291)
alias: Curtis Jackson	...![ floyd clyde ihnp4 mhuxv ]!burl!rcj

fred@umcp-cs.UUCP (10/04/83)

the dramatic effect of having
the arguments pop onto your screen? Typing <exc>x is no easier than
typing $x, which accomplishes the same thing, and is more general
since you're not restricted to single-character variables.

					Fred Blonder
					harpo!seismo!umcp-cs!fred