[net.followup] .3 million vs. 30 children

notes@ucbcad.UUCP (10/14/83)

#R:utcsrgv:-244200:ucbcad:100001:000:616
ucbcad!moore    Oct 13 17:43:00 1983

    Spending money on military HARDWARE which hopefully just sits
    around until it is junked is not just worse from a humanitarian
    point of view.  It dissipates capital from the economy.. instead of
    that money going back into the economy to stimulate consumption,
    the finished product sits in a stockpile.  

What?  How does "military HARDWARE" differ from any other consumed
good in that respect?  Your toaster, television set, etc. don't
go back into the economy.  Only investement in tools and raw 
materials would aid further production and more jobs.


	Peter Moore
	moore@Berkeley
	ucbvax!moore