mmcintos@sirius.UVic.CA (Mark McIntosh) (04/13/91)
[FYI, this began as a message chain from comp.sys.mac.misc] On Wed, 10 Apr 91 20:47:21 GMT, hedstrom@sirius.UVic.CA (Brad Hedstrom) said: >In article <4338@ryn.mro4.dec.com> long@mcntsh.enet.dec.com (Rich Long) said: >> Yes, but--in the demo at least--table formatting was not preserved. It would >> have been nice if Nisus had done something reasonable. [with Word 4 tables] > [stuff deleted ...] >I would imagine that since Word's tables aren't PICTs (one can't copy >and past them except as text, all formatting is lost), they are >proprietary data structures that Microsoft isn't too keen on divulging >to its competitors. Framemaker 3.0 may be able to read Word 4 tables ... in MacWeek of March 5/91, on page 4 they have a story about Framemaker 3.0. In it they describe FM's expanded interchange filters. They say "Enhanced MS Word 4 filters ... support Word's embedded tables and index markers". Since one of the features of FM 3.0 is an implementation of fully formatted tables, does this mean that it can read Word 4 tables and produce an equivalent table in FM 3.0? If not, what exactly can FM 3.0 do with imported Word 4 tables? And, for completeness :-), has anyone used FM 3.0 and been able to compare its table creation capabilities with those in MS Word 4? Mark J. McIntosh <mmcintos@sirius.UVic.CA> ____________________________________________________________________________ University of Victoria, Faculty of Engineering - Dean's Office Box 3055, Victoria, BC, CANADA \ "...the mystery of life isn't a problem to V8W 3P6 (604) 721-6049 \ solve but a reality to experience." UUCP: ...!{uw-beaver,ubc-vision}!uvicctr!sirius!mmcintos \ from Dune