iwm@doc.ic.ac.uk (Ian Moor) (05/25/90)
In article <30420@ut-emx.UUCP> dll@ut-emx.UUCP (Don Loflin) writes: >>Does anyone know about implementations of functional language (not >>Common Lisp) available for PCs, preferably MS-DOS machines or MacIntosh? >> > Please, anyone who knows of a PC implementation, would you also reply to > "dll@emx.utexas.edu" or post to this group. Thanks. Last year Research Software, who market Miranda, told me they were working on Miranda for MSDOS and Macintosh, but I have not heard if they have realeased this yet. Here at Imperial we have an interpreter for a subset of Hope that will run on MSDOS and Macs. I have also seen versions of Scheme available for several micros. -- Ian W Moor ARPA: iwm@doc.ic.ac.uk JANET: iwm@uk.ac.ic.doc Department of Computing, (The skin is mightier than the banana) Imperial College. 180 Queensgate London SW7 UK.
nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk (Nick Rothwell) (05/25/90)
In article <3467@calvin.cs.mcgill.ca> tremblay@quiche.cs.mcgill.ca (Guy TREMBLAY) writes: >Does anyone know about implementations of functional language (not >Common Lisp) available for PCs, preferably MS-DOS machines or MacIntosh? There's a version of ML for the Macintosh; a slightly obselete dialect, but quite useable. Not for the PC, I'm afraid, because they're such horrible machines with tiny brains. Nick. -- Nick Rothwell, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, Edinburgh. nick@lfcs.ed.ac.uk <Atlantic Ocean>!mcsun!ukc!lfcs!nick ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Ich weiss jetzt was kein Engel weiss