[net.followup] REPOSTING: usenet article in Byte Oct 83

sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer) (10/14/83)

I am puzzled by the reaction of ...!nsc!chongo to the Byte USENET
article.  Sour grapes because he didn't write it himself?  His
comments are pure nit-picking, and completely irrelevant for the
article's intended audience.  I thought it was well-written, and
good P.R.

/Steve Dyer
decvax!genrad!wjh12!bbncca!sdyer

eric@aplvax.UUCP (10/21/83)

	Perhaps because I am already familiar with the net, the
Byte article seemed boring, but I really didn't find much useful
in it. I did, however, notice that the map did not seem accurate
for the date that was on it, and the list of groups seemed somewhat
short (no net.rec.nude, etc.). I am not really sure it belonged in
Byte, perhaps it would have been better placed in "Unix Review", and
been a little more technical in nature.

-- 
					eric
					...!seismo!umcp-cs!aplvax!eric