[soc.religion.eastern] Dalai Lama at Cornell, March 26, 1991

dxc4@po.CWRU.Edu (David Condon) (04/23/91)

"Overcoming Differences": a lecture by His Holiness the Dalai Lama at 
Barton Hall, Cornell University, March 26, 1991.

Introduction by President Frank Rhodes of Cornell University:

Your Holiness, Ladies and Gentlemen:

	You will not need me to reassure you that your welcome here 
tonight is joyful and warm. But I want also to welcome those of you who 
are in the audience, here in Barton Hall, in the Statler, and in Alberding, 
in each of which we have a full house -- a total of some twelve thousand 
people here tonight to hear the Dalai Lama. This is surely an indication 
of the celebrity and the deep sense of admiration for our speaker. But 
it's also, I think, a reflection of the interest and the eagerness with 
which the people of this community and other communities are 
reaching out in an effort towards greater world understanding. 
	His Holiness earlier today referred to Mahatma Gandhi as 
somebody whose teachings had influenced him during the course of his 
career. And Mahatma Gandhi was once asked what he thought of 
Western civilisation, and he replied, quietly, "I think it would be a very 
good idea." We reach out and welcome the opportunity tonight to learn 
from an ancient and benevolent civilisation the precious things it has 
to offer. 
	His Holiness is here under the auspices, as you heard from David 
Greenwood, not only of the Mario Einaudi Center for International 
Studies at Cornell, but also the Bartels Fellowship Program in World 
Affairs. Their fellowship program is designed to bring members of the 
Cornell community, and through them, the greater Ithaca community, 
into contact with world leaders. And not only with leaders handling 
political events, but also those whose dedication and inspiration shape 
the feelings and the views and the values that we bring to world affairs. 
The fellowship itself is made possible by the generosity of Henry E. and 
Nancy Horton Bartels. And Hank Bartels is here tonight in the 
audience, and Mr. Bartels, won't you stand up so that the audience can 
salute you for the generosity you've shown in making that possible. 
[applause]
	The Dalai Lama was born in eastern Tibet, and at the age of two, 
was identified by a group of senior lamas and a search party as the 
fourteenth Dalai Lama. Two years later, he travelled to the capital city, 
to Lhasa, and was inaugurated in a ceremony, and then began the long 
tutelage represented over the centuries in his predecessors, by which 
he was educated for the responsibilities of office. Few would have 
guessed, on that fateful day, how severely his leadership skills were to 
be tested. For he was formally inaugurated in 1950, at age fifteen, 
shortly after the Chinese had invaded his country. The invasion was 
described as "modernisation" of Tibet. And to begin with, the Dalai Lama 
accepted it as that, and attempted to work peacefully and cooperatively 
with the Chinese. But rising tensions and rising oppression meant that 
by 1959 he had to move into exile. And with what later became an exodus 
of 100,000-plus followers, he moved into northern India, where he now 
resides. In the forty years that separate us from that event, one sixth of 
the people of Tibet have died at the hands of that modernisation 
program, and more than a hundred thousand have been forced into 
exile. 
	But through it all, the fourteenth Dalai Lama has shown a grace 
and generosity of spirit that have made him the inspiration not only of 
his own people, but also of others across the world. In the face of 
hardship and suffering, he has stood resolutely for the settling of 
human differences by discussion and peaceful persuasion. In the face 
of oppression, he has called for sharing both the burdens and the 
benefits that we hold together across the world. In the face of the 
grossest kind of deforestation and exploitation of the landscape, he has 
talked of the need for living in harmony with nature, and of 
establishing worldwide a basic set of human rights, on which 
misunderstandings could be settled. He has kept alive not only the flame 
of his own religion and culture, but has lighted a flame that has 
enlightened and illumined the rest of the world. [applause]
	It was that inspiration that was recognised in 1989, by the award 
of the Nobel Prize for Peace. And with characteristic modesty,  His 
Holiness accepted the Prize not for himself, but on behalf of the people 
of Tibet, and added in words that are prophetic of his larger sense of 
vocation: "We share this tiny planet Earth together, and we must live in  
harmony and peace with each other and with nature." In the day and a half 
that the Dalai Lama has spent on our campus and within our community, he 
has graced us by that larger vision of his own humanity. And it's of that 
topic that he is to speak to us tonight. His topic: "Overcoming 
Differences." I am proud to present to you His Holiness the Dalai Lama. 
[long applause]

	Brothers, sisters, I am very, very happy to be here with you, and 
especially for these very beautiful flowers [indicating the floral display 
in front of the lectern]. I really enjoy it. [laughter and applause] So 
thank you very much for all the arrangements and I very much 
appreciate it. And I would like to thank those hundreds of people 
without whose effort this opportunity would not be realised. I very 
much appreciate it. 
	Now many people come here, I think, with some expectation. I am 
afraid that I have nothing to offer to you except to share some of my 
thoughts and my own little experience. So perhaps, I hope, some of you 
might find some new ideas, and possibly can adopt them in your life.
	Now the theme on which I am supposed to talk is "Overcoming 
Differences." I think this gathering of people from different places has 
different mental dispositions, and I think between you and me -- I come 
from the East, from Tibet, what people call "The Roof of the World." So 
you see, my culture became something different, and due to different 
culture, I think, even, to a certain extent, my way of thinking also may 
be somewhat different from yours. However, we are all here in one 
place because of larger interests or other factors: we all are in the name 
of humanity: human beings, we are the same. On that level, irrespective 
of what culture, what faith, what profession, we are the same, human. 
On that basis, I think we are together.
	So, always, whenever we find some differences, there are some 
things which combine, which unify. For that, the thought, the mental 
attitude, is the key factor. After all we (every human being), by nature, 
want happiness and joy. We do not want suffering. And I believe the 
purpose of our life,  the purpose of our very existence, is happiness. 
And for that, as I mentioned earlier, the basic factor, the most important 
factor, is our mental attitude. So for happiness, or for calmness, I think 
the most effective factor is within ourselves. So therefore, it is very 
important to realise that we already have it: whether we utilise it 
properly or effectively or not, that is the question. And again, the 
genuine sense of a proper system on the basis of compassion, I consider 
that is the key factor. On that basis, we can develop some kind of a 
realisation of oneness of entire humanity, and on that basis it can be 
possible to develop a sense of universal responsibility.
	Now in today's world, I believe we need that kind of a sense of 
responsibility, that kind of outlook, because I think today, the world's 
structure is such that for example, the modern economy is beyond 
national boundaries; and also in ecological problems, one or two 
individual nations cannot help. And unless entire humanity, worldwide, 
makes an effort, these things cannot be solved. Therefore, I think the 
world itself is now telling us that humanity has to work together on the 
basis of what I usually call a sense of universal responsibility.
	Now for that, I consider the most important thing is the human 
good heart, or human affection. If you have human affection, love and 
compassion,  then that creates the inner strength, that creates the self-
confidence that removes fear. That's very important for our daily life. If 
we have human will, determination, then we can utilise properly 
human intelligence; we can combine human intelligence, human 
determination, human will: then our future definitely will be brighter, 
better. So the prime mover in positive interaction is a good heart. 
	We should not consider the subject of love and compassion, 
forgiveness, these things, as a religious subject. I believe, when a 
human being is born, I think we are free from any religion,  any 
ideology, any faith; but we are not free from compassion and love. So 
therefore, even to the non-believer, the practice of compassion and 
love, these things are really essential. I think, today, we have more than 
five billion souls, human beings. I think true religious believers are, 
perhaps, less than one billion. The remaining four billions are non-
believers. At the same time, human beings, and more than that, the 
majority. So therefore, it is very, very important to realise compassion 
and love, these things, as basic human good qualities rather than a 
religious subject. The various different religions, what they do is, they 
simply strengthen or increase these natural human good qualities. 
	Now everybody, I think, agrees that compassion and love, these 
things are something good. But then the question is, can we really 
cultivate these things, and can we really increase them? Of course it is 
not easy, but I think, definitely, it can happen, it can increase, it can 
develop. Because, firstly, the human mind is, anyway, difficult to 
change; but with proper reasoning, with proper training, mental goals 
can change. Like in my own small experience, for example: when I was 
young, I was quite short-tempered. Usually, I found a good excuse, 
because, you see, my birthplace is the northeastern part of Tibet. 
Usually Tibetans consider people from that area a bit short-tempered. 
And I'm from that part, so that's my excuse. But then, you see, with the 
realisation of the negativeness of anger and the positive things about 
compassion and love, these things: eventually, you see, it changed. Now 
today, of course, still occasionally I have got a temper,  but I think in 
most cases, I am quite calm, [laughter] and occasionally anger comes -- 
remains a few minutes. So according to my own experience, it is very 
possible for this to change, to change for the better. 
	Now because I think that although anger, hatred and jealousy, 
these also are part of the human mind, but I believe the dominant force 
of the human heart, or the human mind, is human love and compassion, 
human affection. There's no doubt. If we look closely at human nature, 
if we examine the rightful frame of our life, in Tibet or anywhere,  I think 
compassion or human affection is the major rule. Anger occasionally 
comes,  but is not the major rule. 
	Now for example, even before birth, while the child still remains 
within the mother's womb, the mother's mental attitude or mental 
tranquility is one crucial factor for the health or proper development 
of the unborn child. Then, after birth, according to modern doctors and 
scientists, the next few weeks are the crucial period for development or 
enlargement of the brain. So during that  period, simply the mother's 
physical touch is the most forceful, most important factor for that 
development. So this indicates that the human body itself needs others' 
affection.
	Now again, it appears that when we learn those lessons which we 
receive from a teacher, these not only teach the subject properly, but 
also caring -- for the whole future, the whole being, well-being. You 
see, the lesson which you receive from a person towards whom you feel 
very close, that lesson usually, you see, goes much deeper in our brain. 
Those lessons you learn from a teacher who doesn't show any sort of 
concern, any feeling towards you, you see, that lesson usually [is 
forgotten]. That also indicates human nature.
	Then, naturally, when we get sick, when we have to go to see a 
doctor: when you meet a doctor full of human feeling, with a smile, with 
a genuine concern for you, then you feel much easier, much more 
comfortable. And sometimes when there is a doctor with a lot of modern 
machines and equipment, the doctor himself or herself seems a part of 
the machine, with no human feeling; then sometimes we feel a little bit 
uncomfortable, don't we?
	So these experiences show how much we need others' affection. 
And then, the last day of our life, at that moment we know that nothing 
our friends do at that point can help; you know, you see, that now you 
are definitely departing from them. Your companions are no more use. 
However, even at that moment, the dying person, surrounded by trusted 
friends, can feel much easier.
	So therefore, I believe the basic human nature is gentleness or 
compassion. Some people argue with that idea that the human basic 
nature is an aggressive nature. Now sometimes I jokingly argue with 
my friends that if we look at our physical structure instead of our 
mental state, or mental nature, it seems we belong to those animal 
species who are more gentle. Look at our nails and our teeth. If we 
examine our own bodies, it seems we look more like deer, or rabbits, or 
geese -- very beautiful, gentle animals -- rather than tigers or lions. 
Then again, in  the human physical structure: if your two arms are used 
for pushing [extending arms straight out] then the result is you will be 
lonely, you will be alone; but if your two hands go this way [drawing 
arms in as in embrace] you get two more friends, right? [laughter and 
applause]
	So, in thinking along these lines, constantly, I feel the human 
basic nature is more positive than negative. So that also is a very 
important factor: that there is a possibility to change from positive to 
negative. Then, again, as I mentioned earlier, by birth, by nature we 
want happiness, we do not want suffering. And love, compassion, a good 
heart, generally bring us fortune, bring us joy and happiness. And a 
good heart brings us more genuine friends -- with genuine smiles. 
	So you see, I think a beautiful, genuine smile is very important in 
our life. When someone feels uncomfortable, or bad about something, 
when a person, whether you know him or not -- when someone shows 
you genuine human feeling, with a genuine smile, it becomes 
something like medicine; it really helps -- very healthy, to remove some 
kind of negative mood or uncomfortable feeling. So therefore, to a 
companion -- to human beings, the genuine smile of a friend is 
something very essential. 
	After all, we human beings are a social animal. Whether we like 
it or not, we have to live together. This nature of ours is so powerful if 
we examine certain animals, such as bees. Their nature is such that they 
have, I think, a very good sense of responsiblity. They have no religion; 
they have no constitution, no police: but somehow, due to their nature 
they all have a sense of responsibility, and a sense of coordination or 
cooperation. We human beings, on the other hand, are the same kind of 
social animal -- and more than that, we have religion, we have 
constitutions, we have many things -- but somehow, in certain ways, we 
are the more stupid. [laughter] So from that viewpoint also, the basic 
human nature is, you see, that compassion is something key, a key 
factor.
	As I mentioned earlier -- friends: how do we make a genuine 
friend? Through anger, through money or force it is impossible to make  
a genuine friend. Genuine friends can be made only through a genuine 
good heart. You know, wealthy people, or people who have power -- you 
see, usually they have got more smiles, more friends. But I often tell 
people that these are not genuine friends. You see, these friends are 
actually the friends of wealth, of money. So long as you have money, 
force, power, these friends will come, will remain. As soon as your 
fortune disappears or goes into a decline,  these friends also disappear. 
So these friends are ready to say goodbye. So you see, when your fortune 
is gone, then even if you try to contact these previous friends, it is very 
difficult to find them, and even if you try to telephone them, you may 
not get an answer; and even if you get some answer, that answer will be 
very short. So therefore, you see, a genuine friend -- a chum? -- must 
come on the basis of your own good heart. Then, again, it is human 
nature that if you help others, if you share others' suffering,  
ultimately that brings us more joy. If we forget others' light, others' 
welfare, and think only of ourselves, then eventually we will be the 
loser. So usually, I say that if we are truly selfish, a selfish wisdom is 
much better than a foolish selfishness. 
	So therefore, thinking along these lines, you will develop a 
certain kind of conviction that a good heart is something really 
essential; a good heart should be a part of your life. Then again, it is not 
sufficient to cultivate mental development only on the positive side. But 
we need a certain effort to reduce the negative side of our mind, such as 
anger. Now there are a variety of angers. Some anger -- I quite agree 
with some modern psychologists who believe that it is better to express 
anger. There is a certain anger which comes due to some previous 
negative experience. Such things express one's injured feelings.  But 
this is not the case with every anger. Generally, if we, without any 
effort, simply let anger come, then it eventually increases. Once we 
realise that anger is something negative, a troublemaker, once we 
realise that, even the realisation itself makes some difference. 
	So now, what is the usefulness of anger? Anger is something 
quite cunning, quite clever. When we are facing some problem, some 
tragedy, then anger comes as a protector. Anger gives us more energy, 
more strength. And on the surface, this sort of anger expels fear -- on 
the superficial level. Yes, anger brings us more energy, but then -- if 
you look closely, that energy is like a blind energy. It is not at all sure 
whether that energy will become constructive or destructive: useful or 
harmful. And wisdom -- when anger dims our light, during that 
moment, it destroys the best part of the human brain. That's true -- in 
our own experience, you see, when we lose our temper, during that 
moment we use all the negative words or bad behaviour, things like that 
-- then, after anger is reduced or disappears, you feel very shy, you feel 
embarrassed to meet that person; sometimes you will try to hide 
somewhere, in order to avoid meeting that person, whom you said 
something very nasty to, right? This shows that anger dominates our 
mind; during that moment a person really becomes something like mad. 
So therefore, anger always brings us negativity.
	Then again, another question: sometimes, you see, if we remain 
very honest, very humble, gentle, then some people, unfortunately, 
may take advantage of that situation. In such a situation, we analyse the 
situation; and if it is really sure that you need some strong counter-
measure, you can take the counter-measure without anger, with reason, 
with realisation of the situation, and use the maximum human 
intelligence. So that counter-measure, in fact, becomes more effective 
than the measure you take motivated by anger. So, thinking along these 
lines, then eventually anger, if it could be measured -- with time it 
gradually goes down. Even if you get some anger, some frustration, it 
may not last long. So this is the way to cultivate positive motivation and 
reduce negative motivation or negative thought. 
	After all, what is the definition of "enemy"? An enemy means a 
force or individual person who destroys your happiness directly, or 
destroys your sources of happiness. Now look: usually we consider the 
sources of happiness -- they are of some variety: friends are one source 
of happiness; wealth also is a source of happiness; and fame, a good 
name -- these things. But then, if we look at these, although these are 
sources of happiness, these sources are not one hundred percent 
guaranteed. Once you have these things, you will definitely get mental 
happiness -- that is not sure. Even wealthy people are sometimes, 
mentally, very worried, right? So these sources are generally sources of 
happiness, but not definite. But the definite one is calmness of mind. 
That is the real source of happiness or joy. 
	Now look: a certain enemy can destroy permanently our wealth, 
our friends, our fame, but cannot directly destroy our mental calmness -
- the mental calmness which is the direct source of joy or happiness. 
That is destroyed only by anger, hate, or jealousy. So therefore, the 
ultimate destroyer of the source of our happiness is anger. So therefore, 
the real, ultimate enemy is within ourselves, not outside. Again, if you 
view your enemy as a person, as long as that person's mind is dominated 
by anger, he will remain an enemy. But as soon as that anger 
disappears, and some kind of friendship feeling develops, that person 
can become the best of friends. But the inner enemy is not like that -- it 
is permanent. So therefore, if we take precautions towards enemies -- 
that's our general practice -- if that is the case, we must take 
precautions against our most awful enemy, which is always within 
ourselves.
	Then again, anger, you see, is also very bad for the health. Anger 
makes the entire situation deteriorate. Anger causes loss of appetite and 
good sleep. So, you see, anger always brings us into suffering; and if 
anger develops to a very high degree, then suicides also happen. It is 
important to have this kind of outlook towards the different parts of 
human thought. The human mind is such that there are a lot of 
varieties, a lot of particles -- some very useful, some not so useful, some 
negative. So the analysis of thought is very essential: then you try to 
increase the positive things, and try to decrease the negative things. So 
then, individually, you will get more calmness, more restfulness. It 
creates genuine peace, a genuine friendly atmosphere within one's own 
family. You yourself will benefit, but your family members will also 
benefit. Through that way, eventually, a friendly or positive 
atmosphere can develop in communities, societies -- things like that. 
After all, the initiative, positive leadership must come from the 
individual. 
	So everybody usually talks about world peace. And world peace is 
really important. How to attain world peace? World peace does not come 
from the sky, nor from the earth, but this peace must come through 
mental peace. Genuine peace is not just the absence of war. Peace is 
more than that. Peace means genuine tranquility, I think; peace must 
come from this sort of individual transformation. So, whether at the 
level of family members, or at the national level,  I believe a good heart 
is the foundation. So I believe the politicians, whether they are 
believers or non-believers doesn't matter, that's their business -- 
"politician" means you are involved in public work, so therefore a good 
heart is very essential.
	Politics itself is nothing wrong. Usually people call it "dirty 
politics" -- not because politics itself is something wrong, but because 
people involved in politics lack this good human quality. That's why 
people sometimes think of it as "dirty politics." A similar thing would 
happen if people like myself, who are involved in religion, were 
lacking this good heart, then religion also would become "dirty 
religion." So therefore, in every human activity, whether it becomes 
positive or negative ultimately depends on our own heart. 
	So this is my belief, according to my own experience, that trying, 
with constant effort, things can change; these positive things can 
develop. The result is a healthier, happier person. That, I believe, is 
something precious. So the conclusion is that a warm heart, a good 
heart, is the ultimate source of happiness, the ultimate source of 
strength. With these things the future will be happier and brighter. 
With these things, whether rich or poor, educated or uneducated, this or 
that religion, this faith or that faith, so long as we are human beings, 
we have this potential. Whether we make a special effort or play an 
important part -- that is up to the individual. 
	So thank you very much. [applause]

Question: In these troubled times, how can one person make a 
difference?

	As I mentioned earlier, the initiative must come from the 
individual. At the beginning, it seems insignificant. But then, if we 
approach it that way, there is the possibility to create or to reach more 
effect. Without personal or individual initiative, there is no possibility. 
And after all, the meaning of society or community is a collection of 
individual people. So that is my belief.

Question: How do you find the strength to forgive people who have 
wronged you?

	Even from the selfish viewpoint, if you allow some ill-feeling to 
remain inside you,  that ill-feeling does not necessarily harm or hurt 
the other. That ill-feeling hurts only your own mental state. For 
example, in my own case: we have some quarrels with our Chinese 
brothers and sisters. Now if I keep some negative feeling, that negative 
feeling would not harm the other side; the ill-feeling destroys my own 
mental peace, and eventually, it would destroy my health. So that way, 
there is the possiblity that the other side may rejoice if I become 
physically weaker. But if I remain as quite a happy person, and an 
easygoing person, I think it helps my mental state to stay calm, and as a 
result I can calculate a better way, a more effective way. So keeping 
negative feelings towards someone is not at all useful -- no use.
	And then again,  I think the most important, very forceful source 
of happiness or joy is one's own hardship. Then, whether things 
become as we expect or not, you feel, as far as my own contribution is 
concerned, I am clear, I am sincere; then there is no point in feeling 
regret. If you yourself keep something negative, then on top of the 
unfortunate things, you also feel much regret. So therefore, thinking 
along these lines, you will develop some kind of courage to show 
forgiveness. That is my way of practice.

Question: How has winning the Nobel Peace Prize changed your long-
term goals?

	Actually, the practice of compassion, of forgiveness, are part of 
my own practice as a Buddhist monk. So far as my practice is concerned, 
nothing has changed. [applause]. As I always say, as one simple Buddhist 
monk, I practice these things; as I mentioned earlier, I realise these 
things are something good for me, good for others, and therefore I 
practice these things. However, since receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, I 
think I feel some kind of further obligation, or more responsibility, to 
express these things, and to try to promote the value of compassion. And 
of course, the Nobel Peace Prize is also a lot of help in the case of 
awareness of the Tibetan problem. The simple reason is that the Nobel 
Peace Prize was received by the "Dalai Lama of Tibet;" nobody said "Dalai 
Lama of China." [applause] So automatically, people get more questions: 
What is Tibet? What happened? and all sorts of questions develop. So that 
way, it is very helpful. Thank you. [applause]

Question: Your Holiness, even though you believe in non-violence, do 
you think China should be punished for its occupation and abuse of 
your country; and if so, how?

	Oh, that's a very complicated question. I, as a Buddhist monk, as a 
person who believes firmly in non-violence and compassion, you see, I 
consider the struggle for the freedom of Tibet not simply a struggle for 
our own rights. This does not mean harming China or the Chinese.  We 
respect the Chinese and China, the most populated nation, and through 
the centuries we lived side-by-side. And we respect the Chinese 
civilisation. As Buddhist monks, in our daily prayers, we always pray for 
all sentient beings. If that prayer is something genuine, then there is 
no point in excluding the most populated nation. So therefore, whether 
people are believers or not, I genuinely feel concern about the welfare 
of China's people, as well as Tibet. This is how I feel. So the struggle for a 
kind a freedom of Tibet, I do not consider this just a mere political 
freedom. I feel this is very much, literally, spiritual, or basic human 
values -- or in our case, a freedom of Buddhism. So therefore, I consider 
the struggle as something of spiritual work. If this were a purely 
political matter, then I would not have such joy, I would not be so 
committed. So a free Tibet means more development or promotion of 
spiritual values -- that definitely can help or contribute to millions and 
millions of Chinese. This is how I feel.

Question: Your Holiness, if Tibetan Buddhism could be summed up in a 
single phrase, what would that phrase be? [laughter]

	I usually summarise it something like this: If you can help other 
people, other sentient beings, do help. If you cannot, at least restrain 
from harming. That sentence concludes all Buddhist practice. [applause]

Question: What can we do as individuals to help free Tibet?

	Already, many countries have groups ... that are friends of Tibet; 
you can join these groups. And then, this year, until next March, is the 
International Year of Tibet. So we are hoping during this period, 
through seminars, through all sorts of activities, to promote awareness 
about Tibet. So definitely you can contribute. And then, I feel that on a 
public level -- it is a very encouraging sight -- many people, including 
the media, the most important newspapers, are very sympathetic. Now 
some way, this public support, strong, sympathetic or supportive 
feeling should eventually reach the government level. So this is my 
hope. How to implement it, I don't know. You know better.

Question: What is the first thing you think about when you awaken in 
the morning?

	Happy day. [laughter, sustained applause, standing ovation]

Transcribed and edited by David Condon

Note: the Dalai Lama spoke without using a prepared text. While he uses 
English sensitively and eloquently, I have occasionally found it 
necessary to make slight alterations in his word order and phrasing in 
order to  make the words more comprehensible in written form. I have 
tried to keep this editing to the minimum.



The following addresses may be contacted for information about Tibet or 
to contribute to humanitarian concerns and efforts for a free Tibet:

The Snow Lion		-- Newsletter and catalogue of books, artwork 
P.O. Box 6483		and other materials relating to Tibet
Ithaca, N.Y. 14851
(607) 273-8506

Rigpe Dorje Foundation		-- sponsors Tibetan monks in exile in 
328 North Sycamore Ave.		northern India
Los Angeles, Calif. 90036

Buddhist Peace Fellowship	-- publishes quarterly journal; holds 
P.O. Box 4650			workshops and other public events; 
Berkeley, Calif. 94704		human rights activism.
(415) 525-8596

Tibet House
636 Broadway, 12th floor
New York, N.Y. 10012
(212) 353-8823