ofut@gatech.UUCP (11/05/83)
Why should we twist each others words to our own meaning in public? This type of ridiculousness does not add anything to the discussion, it merely makes the rest of us that much more tired of all this. If someone says something you disagree with fine, let's spit it out - but don't change the meaning of hir words to say what you want to attack. -- Jeff Offutt School of ICS, Georgia Tech, Atlanta GA CSNet: Ofut @ GATech ARPA: Ofut.GATech @ Csnet-Relay uucp: ...!{akgua,allegra,rlgvax,sb1,unmvax,ut-ngp,ut-sally}!gatech!ofut
notes@ucbcad.UUCP (11/06/83)
#R:gatech:-187800:ucbesvax:3000004:000:808 ucbesvax!turner Nov 6 06:26:00 1983 Why should we twist each others words to our own meaning in public? . . . If someone says something you disagree with fine, let's spit it out - but don't change the meaning of hir words to say what you want to attack. -- Jeff Offutt . . . The amazing thing to me about this "embarassment" of Pollis was the ratio of commentary to original text. (Of course, I'm no less guilty, from looking at some of my dissections.) But was this commentary a "twisting" or an explication of attitudes? If Pollis is *not* willing to give provide his own explication, he thoroughly deserves whatever inferences others might make about his writing. Just "spitting it out" (as Pollis apparently did), is only going to lead to *more* confusion, not less. --- Michael Turner (ucbvax!ucbesvax.turner)