[net.cse] learning unix or not learning unix, another perspective.

jc@sdcsvax.UUCP (John Cornelius) (10/27/84)

First, you really do have to learn something well in order to be able to pursue
the sport further. Unix and C are sufficiently unconstrained environments to
allow you explore the subtleties of operating systems and languages in general.
Most university graduates come out of school as flaming adherants to (and
missionaries for) the operating system they used in school. Unix is probably
less polarizing in that regard than is, say, UCSD Pascal or most of the other
possibilities.

Second, make no mistake about the purpose of a University. While it ain't
Coleman College it is still a trade school albeit one with a little more depth
and class. This philosophy extends even to graduate school and, for the
brightest, to postdoctoral and faculty positions. The objective, in labor
jargon, is to create a master whatever (in this case a master scientist).
Undergraduate work is analogous to being a hod carrier. Graduate student work
is not unlike being an apprentice; you are expected to be productive and to
learn at the same time. Post PhD work is journeyman work. A very few of us
actually become masters at the trade, irrespective of our own opinions about
ourselves.

I do not know where you find yourself in this ladder of accomplishment and
expertise but from your comments I would guess that you're still carrying hod.
For my own part, I am not trying to be a snob, only realistic. I am probably a
good journeyman at this point so I'm certainly not trying to insult anybody.

I wish you the best of luck in your pursuits.


John Cornelius
Western Scientific