[net.followup] Educated Religeous Folk

kissell@flairvax.UUCP (Kevin Kissell) (11/18/83)

Contrary to what George La Belle seems to want to *believe*
"spontaneous generation" was never a religious dogma so much
as a SCIENTIFIC THEORY widely held by natural scientists of the
day because it was the SIMPLEST EXPLANATION for the OBSERVED FACTS.
It didn't take a microscope to disprove it, either, just an
inquisitive Italian with an experimental method.  It was a theory
every bit as valid as those of phlogiston and the luminiferous ether.
Science is allowed to be wrong.  Only those who make a religion
out of it (and there sure seem to be a lot of you out there)
insist that a failed theory must have been unscientific because
"science embodies truth", an assertion philosophically on a par with 
papal infallibility.