[comp.dcom.sys.cisco] Switched 56k and ciscos

replogle@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Joel Replogle) (12/21/90)

John,
  We did a project with switched-56 to check into the possibility
of doing just what you want - use a line only when you need it.  In
checking into it we found there were a very limited number of sites
which had the sw56 service available, and that there were some 
incompatibilities based on the type of switches (our campus DMS-100's
sw56 didn't converse with the local community's AT&T switch).
  We pursued more of a host-to-network connection in an attempt to
avoid the routing issues (whew!).  We had a hard time finding equipment
to run at 56k, and didn't find anything which didn't bundle X.25 in
with it (we *really* didn't want to run over X.25... sigh).

  Sw56 service is similar to plain-old telephone service in that you
dial a number and get a connection.

  One question we wreslted with and then decided to punt:

What do you do with routing to the remote site when the circuit isn't up?

	a) no route.  Means and establish-circuit-based-on-traffic probably
	   wouldn't be able to detect the packets.. unless the detector was
	   located at the same place where the default route originates.
	b) static route.  Detection would work, but how do you avoid black-
	   holing traffic if the connection doesn't come up in time, or the
	   line is busy?  Possibly have the detector send back ICMP network
	   unreachables if the line is busy..?
   Both of these aren't really much of an issue if the detector/switched
	router is located on the default-originating net.  If there is an
	alternate path via default then both the routing and the call setup
	can be a little cleaner.


Joel Replogle
NCSA Networking Development