[net.space] but are we looking??

laura (10/22/82)

	I went to a Carl Sagan lecture at the University of Toronto (here)
about six months ago.  He was speaking on Looking for Extra-Terestrial 
civilisations and raised a number of good points among them:

	EM theory is a relatively recent development on this planet.
Given that we have only had such a small window of time in which we have
been announcing ourselves, is it any wonder that no one has bothered to
come check us out?? (except to two drunken farmers in....)

	Remember what radio noise they are going to be hearing from us:
McCarthy trials, Howdy-Doody....Hmmm I think that I might try someone
else first too given that tracking down Extra-Terrestrial civilisations
was my game...

	We havent looked all that hard!  A large orbital radio telescope
would help...but then that costs money which hasnt been put into space
development in recent times.  If money cannot be found to not turn
Pioneer off and monitor it now I dont see much hope for getting a large
telescope in the future...

	In fact, I like how Sagan presented our search for other civilisations.
He said that he had talked with a person (rather distinguished sort whose
name I cannot recall now, *DARN*) who said that he had conducted this
experiment.  He got up one morning and set his table for an elabourate
dinner for two.  Then he opened the front door and patiently waited. After
a whole day, no lobster had come in to eat dinner with him.  He concluded
that since there was no lobster eating dinner with him there was therefore
no such thing as a lobster......


					Laura Creighton
					decvax!utzoo!laura

ark (10/22/82)

I have heard it proposed that perhaps civilizations only use
radio for a short period -- until they have their planet so
thoroughly cabled that they can use land lines instead.