[net.space] PROXMIRE WINS! space loses!

aka779 (11/05/82)

SENATOR PROXMIRE HAS WON ANOTHER TERM!  The space program weeps.

Senator Harrison Schmitt loses!  Double weeps!

Wisconsin, I understand--just cows and butter up there, and the
dairymen keep voting in their subsidies that we all have to pay...

But, New Mexico!  HIgh-tech desert, why oh why have you
deserted the strongest proponent of the programs that have kept
The Land of Enchantment one of the best places
to work?  Ah, I miss the great southwest, but I am severely
disappointed in my amigos.  My ten years as
a Neuvo Mexicano never prepared me for this turnabout.

--Arlan Andrews, once of Las Cruces and White Sands...

wombat (11/05/82)

#R:inuxd:-20200:uicsl:11100001:000:246
uicsl!wombat    Nov  5 10:38:00 1982

Schmidt lost because the environmental PAC put a lot of money into
the campaign against him. He had one of the worst voting records on
environmental issues in the Senate.
Proxmire's campaign cost him $100. Is there intelligent life
in Wisconsin?

thor (11/09/82)

Regarding the rather obnoxious question of whether there is intelligent
life in Wisconsin, let me answer yes. Let me also remind you that the
task of a senator (or rep to congress) is to represent the needs of
his or her constituents. Very few of Wisconsin's industries are connected
with the space program. (and I believe that has always been the case) So,
why should Proxmire push for money for space (sure in the long run the
benefits could be tremendous) now? The return on the investment in space
for Wisconsin would probably be small right now, however. And the
majority of the voters are concerned with immediate results (in Wisconsin,
in Florida, or in any other state!). Proxmire wants to keep his job
just like the rest of us. 
Let me also remind you as far as intelligence goes that Wisconsin
has one of the finest state University systems in the country. Furthermore,
many of the people reading this net may have been trained at those 
universities in Wisconsin.
By the way, we are not totally myopic. Wisconsin was the first state to
pass as a referendum, a measure to control the buildup of nuclear weapons.
I believe Wisconsin was also one of the first states to provide 
workmans compensation insurance. 
Hopefully, we on the net can refrain from further insults of this
type and at least attempt a good exchange of ideas.
                                         Mark Kohls
                                         UW-Milwaukee 1981
                                         Bell Labs
                                         Naperville

kcarroll (11/09/82)

   I agree that it is unfair to expect a senator who represents
a state in which no space-related industry is based, to "push for
money for space". After all, the principle behind having a senate
in the first place was to protect the interests of the individual
states, by giving the states a part in deciding on legislation that
might affect them. Farsighted senators might see that the future
interests of their state are tied to the future of the human
race as a whole, and that (as I'm sure that most readers of this
newsgroup will agree)  is dependent on our moving out
into space >soon<; however, we can't >expect< a senator to be
far-sighted. Wisconsin-enthusiasts might note that space-enthusiasts
don't really begrudge them their dairy-subsidies, or argue that
Sen. Proxmire is wrong in obtaining thos subsidies. We don't argue
that it should be part of Proxmire's job to push for more funds
for space. We >do< feel that it >should not< be part of his job
to push for >less< funds for space!  It is hard to imagine how
Wisconsin will benefit from a continued low level of funding
for high-tech research throughout the country, unless the funds
diverted from the space program were to be funnelled directly into
Wisconsin's dairy program (which I'm sure they're not).
   While I'm sure that there is intelligent life in Wisconsin,
I'm not sure that it appreciates the havoc its elected representative
is wreaking with researchers in other states. It would be nice
if the hypothetical intelligent life would put a muzzle on its
senator, and keep him from attacking these researchers, who don't
have the resources to defend themselves from senators bent on
re-election at any cost (at any cost to anyone but himself,
that is to say).
   Before flaming on this topic, get yourself a copy of some of the
good senator's "Golden Fleece" press releases, and ask yourself
whether these are fair, reasoned arguments against government spending.
(I beleive a book titled "The Golden Fleece Awards" has been
published, listing some of these).
---Kieran A. Carroll
...decvax!utzoo!kcarroll

doug (11/10/82)

That is a problem with Wisconsin, Florida, every other state, big business
and lots of things - the desire for a quick return on investment.  Proxmire
is short-sighted.  That, in my view, is not a compliment.  If it is
granted that space exploration is in *everyone's* long term interest then
voters, even here in Wisconsin, should push actively for it and throw
those out of office who try to stop it.

Nobody criticizes Proxmire for not pushing for space exploration.  It is
his attempts to actively thwart it that irks a lot of people.

Doug Lerner
doug@uwisc
Madison, Wisconsin

henry (11/10/82)

Jerry Pournelle said it all:  "Anyone who buys Wisconsin cheese is
a traitor to mankind!"

preece (11/15/82)

#R:uwvax:-67000:uicsl:11100004:000:194
uicsl!preece    Nov 15 09:05:00 1982

I imagine that given the dairy subsidy program Proxmire so ably defends,
it doesn't make much difference whether we buy the cheese or not; what we
don't buy in the store we buy as taxpayers...