[net.space] Space Recreation & Politics

bukys (11/30/82)

It's OK with me if Hollywood or GM or whoever is allowed to use the
shuttle or space station for "trivial" purposes, as long as they do not
displace any "serious" users, and as long as they pay through the nose
(meaning real cost + good share of development cost).

I do not agree that the government has any duty to allow such use at
any price less than that.  In other words, Lucasfilm-imitators deserve
no government subsidies for cute zero-g film techniques.

Just think, if the government held fewer purse strings people would
have less excuse for complaining about those purse strings being jerked
around.  Further discussions of the revolutionary idea of "limited
government" should take place in "net.politics" PLEASE.

Liudvikas Bukys
...!seismo!rochester!bukys

REM@MIT-MC@sri-unix (12/01/82)

From: Robert Elton Maas <REM at MIT-MC>
I think I agree with you. Although perhaps NASA should fund some
getaway special where a small explosion in zero-gee vacuum is filmed
to give us the basic idea how much different those special effects
will be from ones filmed on Earth, movie studies should pay their own
way when making special-effects for movies en masse in space. But NASA
should permit that kind of use before they permit random people just
wasting shuttle time for a vacation flight that won't return even a
bunch of exposed movie film.