toddpw@tybalt.caltech.edu (Todd P. Whitesel) (10/19/90)
kreme@isis.cs.du.edu (Avatar) writes: >With a simple upgrade of a faster processor (65c816) and a built in SCSI >port you have an Apple // with the performance of a Macintosh. DON'T SEND THIS. More about the GS needs to be changed before that could be claimed safely; as written it will count against your argument. A bit more accurate way to put it would be "A properly redesigned and improved //gs would fill a gap in Apple's product offerings that even the new Macintoshes do not adequately address, namely low-end home, education, and small business." >There are millions of Apple ][ owners out here that are going to be sorely >disappointed if a few things don't happen: Um, ultimatums aren't going to keep his interest either. >By the by, if the emulator card for the Mac LC was an apple //gs running >at 7Mhz or more, I, personally, would not be complaining. Keep dreaming. The LC can barely handle true //e emulation as it is. Todd Whitesel toddpw @ tybalt.caltech.edu