[net.followup] Irish Genocide: Lesson 3: First Blood

jmg@houxk.UUCP (J.MCGHEE) (12/21/83)

	In th year 1169 the first Anglo-Norman invaders came to Ireland and
took possession of lands around Dublin since this was closest to their
established beachhead on the east coast. Over a period of generations these
Anglo-Norman invaders were gradually absorbed into the native culture and
became as Irish as anyone else so that when king Henry VIII wanted to extend
his rule in Ireland he encountered resistance from these Anglo-Normans who
had originally invaded the country for England. Henry's daughter, Elizabeth I,
by means of very carefully laid-out plans succeeded in extending her rule over
Ireland by means of the "plantation", carefully planned communities of English
colonists who grouped themselves closely together for mutual protection in
fort-like walled towns. At the same time a very vigorous campaign of military
conquest was carried out by the Earl of Essex and Lord Mountjoy so that the
country came completely under English domination.
	Some decades later under Charles I, England experienced the Puritan
revolution which sought to overthrow Charles. The last remaing elements of
English troops loyal to Charles were in Ireland. Under these circumstances
Parliament passed an act on December 8, 1641 stating:
		"It is resolved, that it is fit his Lordship do endeavour,
	with his Majesty's forces (sic), to slay and destroy all the said
	rebels (sic), and there adherents and relievers, by all the ways
	and means he may; and burn, destroy, spoil, waste, consume, and
	demolish all the places, towns, and houses where the said rebels
	are or have been relieved and harboured, and all the hay and corn
	there, and kill and destroy all the men there inhabiting able to
	bear arms".

	On October 24, 1644 another measure passed by Parliament stated:

		"that no quarter shall be given, to any Irishman, or to any
	papist born in Ireland".

	A Puritan political pamphlet of the period stated:

		"I beg upon my hands and knees that the expedition against
	them may be undertaken whilst the hearts and hands of our soldiery
	are hot, to whom I will be bold to say, briefly: `happy is he that
	shall reward them as they have served us; and cursed is he that
	shall do the work of the Lord negligently. Cursed be he that holdeth
	back his sword from blood; yea, cursed be he that maketh not his sword
	stark drunk with Irish blood - that maketh them not heaps, upon heaps,
	and their country a dwelling-place for dragons, an astonishment to
	nations. Let not the eye look for pity, nor the hand be spared that
	pities or spares them; and let him be accursed that curseth them not
	bitterly'".

	The pro-English historian Borlase stated: "the orders of Parliament
were excellently well executed". Pro-English historians Leland and Warner refer
to the letters of the Lords Justices themselves for the fact that the soldiers
"slew all persons promiscuously, not sparing even the women". And Dr. Nalson
another pro-English historian, appeals to the testimony of officers who served
in the Parliamentary army, "that no manner of compassion or discrimination was
shown either to age or sex". Lord Ossory, too, himself a bitter enemy of the
Irish, in a letter to the Earl of Ormond, informs him how the Puritan Lord
President of Munster "caused innocent and guilty alike to be executed".
	One of their officers, named Tichburne, who commanded in Dundalk in
1642, was able to boast that in his district "there was neither man nor beast
to be found in sixteen miles between the two towns of Drogheda and Dundalk, nor
on the other side of Dundalk, in the county of Monaghan, nearer than
Carrickmacross". A English clergyman, Dean Bernard, describing the same scene,
wrote: "By the death of so many men about us, having their houses and all their
provisions either burnt or drawn hither, the dogs only surviving are found
usually feeding upon their masters, which taste of man's flesh made it very
dangerous for the passengers in the roads, who have been often set upon by
these mastiffs, till we were careful to kill them also".
	When in May 1642, the Earl of Clanrickard induced the citizens of
Galway to submit, and took them under the king's (sic) protection, he received
a reprimand from the Lords Justices, declaring that he should have persecuted
them "with fire and sword". Moreover, to prevent like clemency for the future,
"they issued a general order to the commanders of all garrisons, not to presume
to hold any correspondence or treaty with any of the Irish papists dwelling or
residing in any place near or about their garrisons, or to give protection,
immunity, or dispensation from spoil, burning, or other prosecution of war to
any of them, but to persecute all such rebels with fire and sword, according
to former commands and proclamations in that behalf".
	It totally confounds logic to see the Puritan revolutionaries who had
overthrown the rightful (according to English law) king of England calling
themselves "the king's forces" and persecuting the Irish who nominally
supported Charles' lawful claim to be king as "rebels". This demonstrates
that no matter what the circumstances involved the English mind knows only one
equation with respect to the Irish: "Irish = rebels" and "rebels = Irish".

tjt@kobold.UUCP (T.J.Teixeira) (12/30/83)

This article (despite any alleged inaccuracies which I'm not qualified
to judge) does a reasonably good job of explaining how the
England-Ireland mess was started.

Curiously enough, it even explains much of the current situation, even
though the events in the article all happened several hundred years
ago: The Irish and the English each established stereotypes for the
other, and acted on them.  At the time, there may have been some
element of merit in these stereotypes, but it was all long ago.

Hundreds of years later, some Irishmen and some Englishmen are all too
willing to persists in these stereotypes and decide that the @#$% pigs
are only fit to be slaughtered.  Hence the ongoing atrocities in
England and Ireland.

			 * * * * * * * * * *

Rather than continuing to wallow in the muck and mire that caused this
situation, why doesn't Mr. McGhee propose a *constructive* solution to
the problem.

P.S. I don't consider "if the English don't leave Ireland we'll blow
them all up" constructive.
-- 
	Tom Teixeira,  Massachusetts Computer Corporation.  Westford MA
	...!{ihnp4,harpo,decvax,ucbcad,tektronix}!masscomp!tjt   (617) 692-6200