[net.space] re shuttling criminals

cjh@csin.UUCP (07/08/83)

n people; the last
mission had five on board, and several previous have had four.

			The first ones to be executed will not be glorified,
	rather they will become answers to trivia questions

That depends on your point of view; I suppose you've forgotten the name of
Crispus Attucks.

							(we would not want
	to execute a person whose guilt is in doubt anyway)

Bull. (This is of course the first problem with capital punishment; there
is no room for later thoughts.)

I would particularly emphasize the "sick"; what sort of person would use one
of man's greatest achievements (an achievement with a real future, unlike the
closed-ended Apollo missions) as a tool of judicial murder.

REM's arguments have some holes, but far fewer than your idea.

Howard.DLOS@PARC-MAXC.ARPA (07/12/83)

First of all, I wasn't serious when I first proposed the idea, but
apparently you and REM missed the sarcasm, and even so, I think I proved
that my "idea" was practical, while you have proved yourself to be an
extremely narrow minded individual who runs off at the mouth at anything
that conflicts with your closed minded ideology without listening to
what you are saying.

Maybe the military is taking a huge chunk out of the program, but they
deserve it since it is highly doubtful that there would be a space
shuttle without their support in washington.  If the shuttle had no
possible military applications then it would still be just a brilliant
idea.

Somehow I got the impression that the shuttle could hold much more than
10 people, which would make 50% at least 5 people.  The point is that
there was room to spare.

Crispus Attucks was not an executed criminal, ( if you think he was then
you have a deeply twisted sense of logic ) he happened to be the first
casulty in the Revolutionary War. By the way, off the top of your head,
who was the first person to be executed by the electric chair? the gas
chamber? lethal injection?

You don't believe it's possible to execute anyone without thinking that
you were wrong?  I bet you still uncertain as to who shot Reagan and
Lennon.  And if you are sure, I bet you would let them go if they
promised not to do it again.

"sick"?, I remember when man's greatest achievement was the atomic bomb
and it was used to kill thousands of innocent people as well as scar
generations unborn.

My argument might have some holes in it ( if it didn't there would be
nothing to argue about ), but at least I thought before I typed,
something you haven't seemed to learn yet.

I apologize to any individuals who are upset over this comment being
made public.  However, I believe it is only fair I should respond
publicly to any public critisisms.