[net.space] SPS and global heating

bcw@duke.UUCP (11/01/83)

From:	Bruce C. Wright
Re:	SPS and global heating

Although it is true that most of the energy beamed to earth from
an SPS will be radiated into the environment as heat, it does not
at all follow that this will result in more (or even significant)
global warming than fossil fuel.

First of all, much of the energy in generating stations is expended
as heat directly (about 60% as I recall), while in an SPS system the
energy is converted much more efficiently (more like 20% waste or
less as I recall).  This would allow a much larger amount of useful
energy for the same amount of heat load if SPS stations were used.

Secondly, although it is true that the energy from fossil fuel was
absorbed from the sun at one time, it is being released MUCH MUCH
faster than it was ever absorbed from solar energy.

Thirdly, and in many respects most importantly, the net heat accumu-
lation on the earth is going to be the integral sum of the amount of
heat received from the sun minus the amount of heat radiated from the
earth.  The major problem with fossil fuel is NOT the amount of heat it
produces directly (though that is a local problem in many places), but
the amount of carbon dioxide that it produces, which tends to hold
the heat better than most of the other compounds in the atmosphere;
therefore fossil fuels reduce the amount of heat which can be re-
radiated by the earth IN ADDITION to adding to the heat load directly.

In addition, in many places power is generated by wood or other recently
living plant matter.  This has the effect of decreasing the ability of
the biosphere to absorb carbon dioxide, aggravating the heating problem.

Objecting to SPS because it would increase the earth's heat load is
JUST PLAIN SILLY.  There are many other problems with SPS (notably the
fact that it is not a tested technology, and depends on several factors
which are themselves not tested technology - such as assembly of large
objects in space, how to get the material there when we have no experience
with doing this on that magnitude from either the earth or the moon, etc),
but this is a red herring.

			Bruce C. Wright @ Duke University