gypsy@silver.lcs.mit.edu (The Gypsy) (06/25/91)
Sorry about this double-port, but I forgot something else... Which (in your opinion, anyone) are the best compilers (for Pascal and for C) for the Apple IIgs? Orca? APW? Others?? Also, if possible, please let me know the current VERSIONs they are selling. Thanks (again!)... -- /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ \ The Gypsy gypsy@silver.lcs.mit.edu The Gypsy / / "Can I play with Madness?" - Iron Maiden \ \--------------------------------------------------------------------------/
q4kx@vax5.cit.cornell.edu (Joel Sumner) (06/25/91)
In article <1991Jun25.060623.17445@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>, gypsy@silver.lcs.mit.edu (The Gypsy) writes: > Which (in your opinion, anyone) are the best compilers (for Pascal and for > C) for the Apple IIgs? Orca? APW? Others?? > > Also, if possible, please let me know the current VERSIONs they are selling. I would recommend Orca/Pascal v1.3. It is not as 'slick' as complete pascal but it is much better and more stable. Orca/C is the only 'C' to my knowledge that takes advantage of the IIgs processor so I think that is your only option. -- Joel Sumner GENIE:JOEL.SUMNER This .sig may not be used q4kx@cornella.ccs.cornell.edu q4kx@cornella for public viewing or q4kx@vax5.cit.cornell.edu q4kx@crnlvax5 rebroadcast without the .................................................... express written consent The impedance of absolutely nothing is 377 ohms. of major league baseball.
cmm@en.ecn.purdue.edu (Chris M McKinsey) (06/25/91)
In article <1991Jun25.060623.17445@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu> gypsy@silver.lcs.mit.edu (The Gypsy) writes: >Sorry about this double-port, but I forgot something else... > >Which (in your opinion, anyone) are the best compilers (for Pascal and for >C) for the Apple IIgs? Orca? APW? Others?? > The best in my opinion are from the ByteWorks. Orca/C and Orca/Pascal. I believe Orca/C is at v1.2, and Orca/Pascal -- gosh. I don't really recall. Anyone else remember? cmm
sk2f+@andrew.cmu.edu (Seth D. Kadesh) (06/26/91)
I don't have it yet, but I've heard good things about Complete Pascal 2.0 (used to be TML Pascal). Don't let the old company name turn you away - Complete Technology is under new management. -seth tHe mAd ScienTisT, and other carnations ----------------------- sk2f@andrew.cmu.edu | everything seems so easy this way but I'm going under tmSatCMU@DRYCAS.BITNET| fast, I'm slipping away, am I so crazy? - Marillion
stug@pro-palmtree.cts.com (Stu Graves) (06/27/91)
In-Reply-To: message from gypsy@silver.lcs.mit.edu
In my opinion TML Pascal II is the best Pascal compiler. I like the fast
compile and link times (I have not seen better compile and link times with
any other GS compiler).
TML II also has a built in resource editor that life a lot easier. I don't
believe that there can be many people still defining their windows, menus
etc in code anymore.
--
stug@pro-palmtree.cts.com
-- The Palmtree BBS (213) 450-9394 300-9600 v.32/42bis, MNP 1-5 --
Santa Monica, California