wwm@pmsmam.uucp (Bill Meahan) (10/15/90)
The subject line gives tha basic question.
We have not YET upgraded our TeX package to 3.0 (or any other virtual
font scheme). Can I still compile and use Tom Rokicki's dvips (5.395)
or should I put that off until after the upgrade of the rest of the system.
In other words, does the lack of virtual fonts in my TeX mess things up?
--
Bill Meahan WA8TZG |"The freedom of human beings is not a condition
uunet!mailrus!umich!pmsmam!wwm |but a task. What an absence of shackles means
|is our duty to know and to establish our own
"I do NOT speak for anyone |limits. It is often more difficult to be free
but me, myself and I!" |than not to be free ...." -Bela Vargaspqr@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Sebastian Rahtz) (10/18/90)
In article <1990Oct15.145511.5021@pmsmam.uucp> wwm@pmsmam.uucp (Bill Meahan) writes:
We have not YET upgraded our TeX package to 3.0 (or any other virtual
font scheme). Can I still compile and use Tom Rokicki's dvips (5.395)
or should I put that off until after the upgrade of the rest of the system.
In other words, does the lack of virtual fonts in my TeX mess things up?
virtual fonts have nothing to do with TeX; they are a driver facility.
TeX sees normal TFMs, therefore it doesn't matter whether your TeX is
2 or 3
sebastian
--
Sebastian Rahtz S.Rahtz@uk.ac.soton.ecs (JANET)
Computer Science S.Rahtz@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Bitnet)
Southampton S09 5NH, UK S.Rahtz@sot-ecs.uucp (uucp)