[net.space] Interstellar spaceflight - not so fast

richard@sequent.UUCP (01/15/84)

First of all, I don't really believe that Interstellar anything will
be available within this century.  If the U.S. space program had
continued without loss of enthusiasm after the Apollo program - when
NASA was at it's zenith - Interstellar flight might have come much
sooner.  But it's doubtful now that we could even reach the moon
in ten years!  Alot of things have changed in the space industry - 
not the least of which is that NASA is now bogged done by a bureaucracy
that didn't exist in the '60s.  And, most tragic of all, our recent
administrations haven't realized that space could again be the great
moral booster it was back when; so the people are interested.

As for the other point - should we wait for the spacecraft that can
achieve a considerable fraction of light speed (or even the dreamt-of
FTL drive) or should we send out generation ships ASAP?  It is my
humble opinion that the slow-boat method will also be a futile effort
to be superseded by faster craft - but I believe we should go for it.
With the world in the politically volitile state it's in, we should
send out seeds as soon as they have a reasonable chance of surviving.

There is, of course, alot of ethical discussion about whether we 
should start other worlds before we've learned to take care of this
one, but this argument presupposes that the damage done to Terra
rests solely on the shoulders of the current generation.  If your
parents willed you a house that was falling apart, would you think
twice about living somewhere else while renovating the old place
(assuming you could afford it)?

It is my belief that mankind should strive for all knowledge, and
journeying to the stars will be a requisite part of this quest.
Does anyone have a better suggestion as to the purpose of humanity?

			...!sequent!richard
				the rider in black

ksbszabo@wateng.UUCP (Kevin S. B. Szabo) (01/16/84)

Someone asked if anybody else had a better idea of what the purpose
of humanity is. Well, tongue placed firmly in cheek, I will tell
you all my father's stand on this.

After examining the many and varied ways that nature has been
taking care of itself, my father realized that we do indeed have
a purpose on this earth. Like the wood peckers that remove the
bugs from the trees, and the bees that allow reproduction of
the plants, our purpose is to *release the carbon that has
become trapped below the surface of this planet*! Could anything
be more obvious? For millions of years carbon has been removed
from the life cycle of this planet, yet it is a vital component
of every creature on this planet. Thus we have removed the
carbon, burnt it, and made it available to nature again.
( Quite efficiently actually , and at a very quick pace. something like
one century of our industrial existance has removed multi-million
years of entrapped carbon ).  Think of ourselves as well educated
ants..... Kinda' makes you feel insignificant doesn't it?

Maybe this should be in net.jokes? net.religion????

				Kevin.
-- 
	Kevin Szabo  watmath!wateng!ksbszabo (E.E. U of Waterloo)