[net.space] The "grabbing onto Solar Max" Problem

fisher@dvinci.DEC (Burns Fisher, MRO3-1/E13, 231-4108) (04/18/84)

1)
Several previous notes have talked about whether a person would be strong
enough to stop Solar Max's rotation.  Here is a point that no one seems to have
mentioned:  Assuming that Pinky gets himself beside the solar panel at 0
relative velocity, then hangs on an shuts off his MMU jets, his grip/arms/etc
would have to supply a certain amount of centripital force to keep him from
flying out at a tangent to the spinning spacecraft.  The amount of force
depends on the rotation rate, the radius of the spin, and the mass of
Pinky/MMU.  I don't know how much that amounts to, but since he was able
to rendezvous with the panel, we have to assume that force is less than or
equal to the force that his jets can give, which is only a few kg.  (I think
I heard around one pound per jet).  Now suppose while he is hanging on, he
cranks up his jets to produce force in the same direction (tangential).  The
jet's force simply adds to the centripital force, with the result being
2*(a few kg), certainly within range of even a weak person's muscles.  Thus,
I don't think that an astronaut's strength has anything to do with the problem.

2)
>Why not just hold on and use attitude hold?
>>It would come to some difficult-to-predict equilibrium, not stopped

Sure it would if he had no propulsion, but he does! I contend that if he could
hold on long enough, AND he had enough fuel, AND he could exert force on the
solar panels in all directions to counter all the various precession movements
the thing might make, that he could stop it.  Undoubtedly, though, one of the
various conditions above could not be met, and thus the wobble.  Thank heaven
for magnetic torqueing and clever ground controllers!

Burns

russ@bmcg.UUCP (04/19/84)

My understanding, according to AvWeek articles, is that
the MMU has only an attitude-hold mode, not an inertial
position hold mode.  The attitude-hold mode was critical 
for the dock-and-halt maneuver since the docking point was
relatively near the man-sattelite center of gravity.  At 
that position, nearly all motion is rotational, rather 
than translational.

...Russ Schnapp

warner@orca.UUCP (Ken Warner) (04/19/84)

[bugs]

Could this be the space equivalent of steer riding in a rodeo?
Grabing a rotating object in space could turn into a wild ride.
Maybe this will be one of the asteroid miner's sports.