[rec.arts.cinema] Ideology and Cinema Sound Technology - Part 4

chris@sloth.bc.ca (Chris Brougham) (06/25/91)

	     Ideology and Cinema Sound Technology - Part 4
			  Chris Brougham  1991

			       Conclusion

	A discussion of ideology and cinema sound technology cannot be
wholly considered without an examination of actual socio-historical
material.  Comolli quite correctly has addressed the economic aspect of
cinema, and Doane has also contributed with the examination of the
practices and design features of technologies that produce soundtracks.
However, by identifying purely economic factors or the effacing ability
of the Quattrocento perspective as the location of cinema technology's
ideology, context becomes reduced to a non-issue.  It would seem that
this is the result of film theories developed along the lines of
Althusserian structuralist Marxism and the psychoanalysis of Lacan that
reduce the complexity of cinema to identifiable structures which exclude
the indeterminacy of the perceiving audience and empirical historical
data.  Not wishing to rely on problematic and ahistorical formalist
arguments to identify ideological articulations, this paper has tried to
examine two sound technologies which, considered in Doane's sense, are
ideological, but when reconsidered within their actual socio-historical
context may be seen as promoting or inhibiting an ideology of
"professionalism."  In the preceding analysis of Nagra and Dolby, it was
suggested that Nagra technology helped to challenge the dominance of
professionalism and that Dolby helped to strengthen it.  This paper has
employed a concept of ideology that focuses less on structural or formal
configurations of cinema sound technology and more on actual usage
within specific historical circumstances.  However, the emphasis on
context must not be construed as a lapse into historical relativism and
the resulting claim that technology is neutral.  Indeed, the
technologies of cinema soundtrack production do map out certain
boundaries in which the filmmaker must work; however, the boundaries are
drawn in more than formal or economic terms and also include aesthetic
and ideological components, such as professionalism.

	The technologies of Nagra and Dolby each were developed to
satisfy a perceived lack in film production, and their introduction to a
greater or lesser degree affected cinema practice.  Since the
ideological implications are examined on the historical and social plane
of Hollywood standardization and professionalism rather than the
theoretical plane of bourgeois ideology, it was suggested that
ideological propensities and differences between the technologies were
in evidence.  This piecemeal approach, although less elegant than the
theoretical approach, has the advantage of identifying possible
differences in technologies rather than casting all sound production
that follows a realist model into the bourgeois ideological camp.  It is
also important to note that emphasizing context has the advantage of
accounting for change.  Although Nagra technology might have originally
allowed independent filmmakers access to affordable means of film sound
production, more affordable recent technologies, such as crystal sync
compact cassette recording, challenge the Nagra system much the same way
Nagra challenged optical recording.

	In conclusion, a critical examination is needed in areas such as
the methodology and critical vocabulary of film theory to avoid over
generalization and equivocation.  This paper has attempted to apply such
an examination to the concept of ideology and film technology --
specifically sound technology -- and in so doing has, hopefully,
contributed to a materialist project of inquiry.  Other concepts, such
as suture, and methodologies, such as psychoanalysis, also need to be
examined within the context of ideology.  And finally, even in the
postmodern age of Baudrillard, an aesthetic theory that does not
discount realism as a mere bourgeois ideological articulation should be
offered since, to paraphrase Frederick Jameson, the referent has not
disappeared, it has merely gone underground.


                         References

Allen, Ioan.  The production of wide range, low-distortion optical
	soundtracks utilizing the Dolby noise reduction system.
	Journal of the Society of Motion Picture and Technical
	Engineers, 1975, 84, 720-729.

Althusser, Louis.  For Marx.
	New York: Pantheon Books, 1969.

Althusser, Louis.  Lenin and philosophy and other essays.
	London: New Left Books, 1971.

Altman, Rick.  Introduction.
	Yale French Studies, 1980, 60, 3-15.

Barthes, Roland.  Mythologies.
	New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.

Baudry, Jean-Louis.  Ideological effects of the basic cinematic
	apparatus.
	In Theresa Hak Kyung Cha (Ed.), Apparatus.  New York: Tanam
	Press, 1980.

Bazin, Andre.  The myth of total cinema.
	In What is Cinema? I.  Berkeley: University of California Press,
	1967.

Belton, John.  Technology and aesthetics of film sound.
	In Elisabeth Weis & John Belton (Eds.), Film Sound.  New York:
	Columbia University Press, 1985.

Bordwell, David, Staiger, Janet, & Thompson, Kristin.  The classical
	Hollywood cinema: Film style & mode of production to 1960.
	New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.

Benton, Ted.  Philosophical foundations of the three sociologies.
	London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977.

Benton, Ted.  The rise of structural Marxism: Althusser and his
	influences.
	London and Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1984.

Buckland, Warren.  Critique of poor reason.
	Screen, 1989, 45, 81-103.

Carroll, Noel.  Mystifying movies: Fads and fallacies in contemporary
	film theory.
	New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.

Comolli, Jean-Louis.  Technique and ideology: Camera, perspective, depth
	of field.
	In Nick Browne (Ed.), Cahiers du Cinema III: 1969-1972 The
	Politics of Representation.  London: Routledge, 1990.

Comolli, Jean-Louis, & Narboni, Jean. Cinema/Ideology/Criticism.
	In Cahiers du Cinema III.  1990.

Doane, Mary Ann.  Ideology and the practice of sound editing and mixing.
	In Film Sound.  1985.

Doane, Mary Ann.  The voice in the cinema: The articulation of body and
	space.
	In Film Sound.  1985b.

Dolby Laboratories.  Advertisment.
	Journal of the SMPTE, 1973, 82, 44-45.

Epstein, Rudolph R., & O'Donnell, Leo H.  Modifications of tape
	recording equipment for use with the pilot tone synchronization
	system.
	Journal of the SMPTE, 1961, 70, 972-975.

Frayne, John.  A compatible photographic stereophonic sound system.
	Journal of the SMPTE, 1955, 64, 303-308.

Handzo, Stephen.  A narrative glossary of film sound technology.
	In Film Sound, 1985.

Johnson, William.  Sound and image: A further hearing.
	Film Quarterly, 1989, 43, 24-35.

Kellogg, Edward W.  History of sound motion pictures.
	In Raymond Fielding (Ed.), A technological history of motion
	pictures and television.  Berkeley: University of California
	Press, 1967. 

Lovell, Terry.  Pictures of reality: Aesthetics, politics, pleasure.
	London: British Film Institute, 1980.

Mills, Charles W., Goldstick, Danny.  A new old meaning of "ideology."
	Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Revue, 1989, 28, 417-432.

Oudart, Jean-Pierre.  The reality effect.
	In Cahiers du Cinema III.  1990.

Schreger, Charles.  Altman, Dolby, and the second sound revolution.
	In Film Sound.  1985. 

Vilar Pierre.  Marxist history, a history in the making: Towards a
	dialogue with Althusser. 
	New Left Review, 1973, 80, 65-106.

Uhlig, Ronald.  Stereophonic photographic soundtracks.
	Journal of the SMPTE, 1973, 82, 293-295.


Williams, Raymond.  Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory.
	New Left Review, 1973, 82, 3-16.

Wood, Robin.  An introduction to the American horror film.
	In Bill Nichols (Ed.), Movies and Methods II.  Berkeley:
	University of California Press, 1985, 192-220.

--
chris brougham
chris@sloth.bc.ca