[net.space] eclipse arranged instead of accidented? / disk at prime focus

REM%MIT-MC@sri-unix.UUCP (06/11/84)

From:  Robert Elton Maas <REM @ MIT-MC>

Aha, indeed putting the occluding disk at the prime focus of the solar
telescope instead of "in front" solves the parallax problem, and if
everything in the light path up to the occluding disk, except the
primary mirror, is painted flat black and if all dust is carefully
removed from the mirror and everything else along that path, the
internal reflection problem should be minimized. (I presume it'd be
impossible to eliminate internal reflections in a lens, thus I say
mirror instead of lens, but I may be mistaken.) With a
long-focal-length primary mirror, so the primary image will be
relatively large, diffraction around the edges of the occluding disk
should also be minimized.

Thanks for the info/correction. (But if the technique is so workable,
why are natural eclipses so important even now? Why don't we see
wonderful artificially-occluded solar images from space every flight
of STS, making natural eclipses moot? My guess, funding is short, STS
flights are all booked, ...)