cgs@umd5.umd.edu (Chris G. Sylvain) (06/16/90)
Has anyone else noticed the bug in MouseInit(), which is supplied as part
of MOUSE.C ?
The bare _asm{ ret } when the mouse is not available is NOT the way to
return( 0 ); without trashing the program stack.
If the code is changed to split the _asm block and use a return() instead,
then it works fine. I guess everyone at Microsoft has a mouse ?
--
--==---==---==--
Outgrabe: Like a bellowing and whistling, with a kind sneeze in the middle
-- ARPA: cgs@umd5.UMD.EDU BITNET: cgs%umd5@umd2 --
-- UUCP: ..!uunet!umd5.umd.edu!cgs --