CARBUCKLE@UMKCVAX1.BITNET (Valentine M. Smith) (02/09/90)
This is mostly a response post, to too many questions I've let accumulate. First, let me expand on comments made yesterday. I recall suggesting a range of ways the reunification could go. I personally believe that the Allies will attempt to have a say despite the FACT that the World War has been over 45 years, if only because Germany's neighbors are already expressing fears about a reunified Germany. I think the idea of a reunited Germany within NATO is intriguing, but how realistic...? (No disparaging of you, Prof. Ryle!) The federation of the Germanies, or the Soviets, seems more likely, though form seems still rather nebulous. I think the world, or Europe, voting on this issue would be an unworkable proposition. In the end result, though hassles still are going on, monetary union appears to what will happen first. Then the issue of the Allies, et al will be resolved somehow. Then the two Germanies will hold a plebecite(may be a bad word, maybe a referendum?) and formally vote on whether to unite. I believe the vote will be a resounding yes. What name? Does it matter? They'll work it out, though I bet Deutsch is in the nation title somewhere. As to Randy Appleton's assertion that the Warsaw Pact will last 17 years more by treaty- I would only point out that many treaties have been broken in Europe in just this century. If the Germanies chose the neutrality scenario(which Kohl opposes), the issue of NATO/Warsaw Pact could ducked somewhat. Again, I agree with Randy that a relationship with western Europe and the US is long-term, I would say that could possible with a United European Federation too. Whether NATO and/or Warsaw Pact will survive, less sure on the form of that. I think both are dying before our very eyes, and only the members refuse to accept that. To comment on John Harlan's comments on the march on the 4th- I believe this to be close to an unprecedented manifestation in Russian history-a peaceful, "sanctioned" march of such magnitude and diversity of beliefs is staggering to behold and contemplate upon. I don't believe the Soviets have cut any arms per se, but I believe their rate of expansion in this area has slowed way down. Jerry Anderson's comments on nationalist movements in the USSR leave out two more feeble areas of protest and restlessness-the Ukraine, which has always had a simmering nationalist movement under the surface, and Siberia, where miners struck several times last year. All of the five "Central Asian" republics are restive, but none with the organization the Azeri have. To answer John Landry's query on do I think the "mainline media" is covering these momentous changes inadequately. Primarily yes. Two reasons come immediately to mind. The half hour format of the three networks just doesn't have the time to do the situation justice at all. In that respect, CNN has them cold. But even CNN could do better, like a reporter in every republic and daily reports from each run several times. The mainline media needs to go to a one hour format, as of five years ago. They cannot begin to adequately tell this Info era audience enough under current program restrictions. I say this in the face of cutbacks by all three networks in the news area, because there's no money in news. Too bad, I think that's why the slightly odious Ted Turner's network is knocking 'em dead. Obn Romanian AIDS cases, and the new news that such a problem was also hitting the USSR- the children referred to in the Romanian story, on both CNN and ABC, were not defined by age, I got the impression they were under teenager in age. Sick is defined in this context as unwell enough to be hospitalized. I agree with Jim Zuelow's assertion that CSPU is in a good position from a dominant party position, though I disagree that they're as strong as he thinks. I heard from one of the Pushkin Square radicals earlier today thatr there might be a couple dozen major parties, and a couple hundred minor ones throughout the USSR. Talk about fragmentation! But a lady on the street in Moscow said it best today-"We have no tradition, we don't know how to deal with new parties." I sense that accurately sums up a lot of Russians feelings on this. However, that sly fox, Gerasimov of the Foreign Office, was interviewed todauy on this subject. He indicated that the CPSU had every intention of staying in power, and "The party is going to be one of the others-but the Communist party will want to be more equal than the others." A thing I didn't know before reading my Christian Science Monitors for the last few days. Until 1940, Moldavia was part of Romania, which the Soviets seized, though I don't know what rationale was given. The leader of the National Peasent's party, who spent 15 years in Ceausescu's prisons, a fellow named Ion Puiu, asserts that he was born there and sees as a long-term goal of Romania's is to get that territory back. This would back up my assertion in a couple of these posts that the map will change several times before all this is over. Already there are a dozen nebulous parties in that country, including the Greens, reported to have 50 members meeting at one's apartment in Bucharest. Are we talking instability for years, as several on both POLITICS and USSR-L have suggested? Probably so, though I would see the next six months as critical, not unlike the period between the March and October Revolutions of 1917. A lot has yet to take place, and probably will. While I agree that the CPSU is the most organized and financially fixed of the Soviet parties, they are bitterly despised similtaneously. Gorbachev is seen as separate from the party and to use a quote I heard a reporter use earlier today, he IS the "scrambling quarterback" of the team. But the team is losing their ass, and the game is now in the last quarter. So a lot has to happen damned fast. One rival group, the Inter-Regional Group, had a spokesman, Mezentev, offer that their group was disorganized and broke, but he sounded pretty optimistic about their future at the same time. One thing that intrigues me(this came on a walk this afternoon in our unbelievably balmy weather-60 in February in Missouri?) is the lack of mention by any commentator on this whole USSR scene about the KGB and GRU and their role in this "new democracy." It would be good if the Soviets denounced the use of secret police, but don't look for this to happen soon! Lastly, as my emphysema has been terrible this week and I need more rest than I'm getting, to comment on Paul Mason's humorous comment on Gorby being a "deep plant" of the CIA. Somehow, I don't think it possible. The guy hasn't been out of the country enough to be glommed onto, I don't think. ( I truly could be wrong on this, no data.) One more comment. Lois, moderator of POLITICS, has USSR-1.file at Listserv@ucf1vm, which can be gotten by a GET USSR-1 File to that listserv address as I understand it. USSR-2.file is a "work in progress" which you have to ask me for until it reaches about the same length as USSR-1.File, 168 blocks. Thanks for your patience, indulgence, and praise. VMS
CARBUCKLE@UMKCVAX1.BITNET (Valentine M. Smith) (02/28/90)
The news has been facetiously talking about the "Communist states" that are "left" after all the recent changes- Cuba and Albania are apparently it. The Kremlin apparently can no longer afford to prop up the Cubans. The East German Round Table discussions reject the idea of a "unified" German army, approves a course of demilitarization for the "new" Germany. Somehow, the great divergence between the positions of the west and east HAVE to collide, so far, both sides seem, to be ignoring the pronouncements of the other. Greenpeace opened an office in East Germany today. Polish relations with Israel are about to improve from their cessation in 1967, Defense Minister Aron is there at present, he's to meet with both the President and Prime Minister. The first phase of Soviet troop withdrawal from Czechoslavakia is to be ended by "late spring," 25,000 are to be out at the end of this phase. Havel is to meet with the widow of Sakharov today, and lay a wreath at his tomb. There is to be convened in the United States in mid-April an environmental conference, to which the Soviets and the Ostbloc nations have been invited. The Presidential powers "bill" has come up in the Supreme Soviet this morning, it would provide for a direct Presidential election in four years. In China, according to the China News Digest, the ousted party leader Zhao Ziyang, will be stripped of his non-Communist posts at the National People's Congress on March 20th, or maybe even at the China People's Political Consultative Conference scheduled for March 19th. More changes brewing! The rulers want "no open rebellion" at these meetings. Later on, will try to comment in detail on these issues.
CARBUCKLE@UMKCVAX1.BITNET (Valentine M. Smith) (02/28/90)
This is a bit on the speculative side, on the increase of powers for the Presidency of the Soviet Union rammed through the Supreme Soviet by Gorbachev today. Earlier today, Craig Cyr asked me if I'd care to comment on a Soviet presidency like an American Presidency WITHOUT the checks and balances. I would echo the arguments raised within the Supreme Soviet - that this decision makes Gorbachev a potential dictator, there's no guarantee that Gorbachev won't use force to put down emergencies, that there is a risk of allowing Gorbachev to assume Stalin-like powers, that allowing Gorbachev to decide what constitutes a _state of emergency" may, in the long run, act against the interests of the people as a whole. I think MG's hold on the Army and intelligence apparatus is tenuous, whether they would act as they did in Ceausescu's case, or as they have in the past, such as "Prague spring," remains to be seen or tested. The Azerbaijan business, and the brief flaring in Tadzhikistan, has shown the Army still in support of the state, but will that hold? The People's Congress of Deputies is now scheduled to meet "in late March," my guess would be that Monday after the last election on March 25th.(the 26th) This body is supposed to "ratify" the "laws" passed by the Supreme Soviet; if I sound dubious, I guess I feel what is happening is acceptance of the "Leader's line" as opposed to really original thinking on the part of the Soviet. I would agree that Gorbachev needs to stick to some form of "democratization" as he outlined in PERESTROIKA, and that the office he just expanded the powers of needs to operate(perceptionally at the least)as democratically as possible. He wishes a "strong Presidency," yet he needs be cognizant of the fear the populace has of another Stalin-like figure at the top. Two years from now, you ask? I continue to maintain the "little federations" inside the bigger Soviet "commonwealth" as the probable dirction of things on the largest canvass. eastern Europe may also federate, anmd some will even join the EC. About NATO, I sense a collision on the way to happening, but don't see the plan past that yet. Things like the KGB/GRU are still unresolved, as is the course of Soviet economics. The chervonets asked about 3 February seem illusory to me, will the Soviets be willing to deal in the world with as gold-backed currency? question remains unanswered, and so far, the USSR is not willing to make the ruble convertible. they have to to join the new reality of economic interchange. Lastly, the Soviets do have the ability to perceive some realities clearly. Giving any new military assistance to Nicaragua is now "up in the air," says the Soviets today. Right on! What about Cuba?