[bit.listserv.disarm-l] technology controls and global hot air

CORNWELL@IUBACS.BITNET (Rubbles? no, WRUBEL) (02/07/90)

Okay enough rehashing the past for awhile.  let's talk about the
present and some conceivable variant of the future!

The present:  the nets are alive with queries about how to
communicate by e-mail with the Soviet Union, for obvious reasons,
such as e-mail being far superior to many other costlier forms of
exchange.  Emailing the Soviet Union is at best a PAIN and at
worst needlessly difficult.  Seems the "powers that be" (WHO?)
decided that Moscow State University could not join BITNET
because of the fear that those "evil commies" would somehow, via
BITNET (HOW?--does this assertion consitute advertisement of some hitherto
unimagined security breach?), gain access to supercomputers to
radically improve their bomb technology.

Someone ELSE gets to flame about the security benefits of "more
reliable" or "better" bombs.  My questions:  any tom-fool
legitimately affiliated with some institutions can get Bitnet
accounts; at other places Soviet guests cannot get accounts
explicitly because they are Soviets.  Can anyone think of a
rationale for this discrepancy?  Does anyone beside me think that
policies like this mean that only the most hard-core military or
intelligence operatives have access to reasonable e-mail while
peaceful academic exchange gets swallowed up in meaningless
"security?"

Now the future and the matter of global hot air:  even though MGU
can't join Bitnet for fear that they will gain access to
supercomputers, the western firm Control Data Corporation is now
applying for a waiver of COCOM restrictions in order to sell the
SOviet Union a supercomputer to (hold onto your hats) IMPROVE THE
SAFETY OF THE CHERNOBYL-TYPE NUCLEAR REACTORS!!!!!  Heaven knows,
improved safety is needed, especially if the Sovs are going to
overcome MASSIVE public objections to their nuclear program and ,
as a sideline, MAYBE cut down their use of fossil fuels and
contribution to global warming.  However, enquiring minds want to
know, just how much queasiness does this idea induce among people
on the net????

Dorene "Hell no we won't glow?!?" Cornwell