[list.ibmtcp-l] SNALINK performance

Don Smith <SMITH@GECRDVM1.bitnet> (02/23/90)

 Item of interest:  PING times via SNALINK
3090-600E with VM platform PINGing the CRMVS platform using SNA VTAM
x-domain.
 VM platform PINGing ISOVAX (8600) and GRUMPY (Sun) via BTI/ETHERnet
over VITALINK bridge at (384K) to the Lab ETHERnet backbone.
 What kind of SNALINK performance are others seeing ??

R; T=0.01/0.01 08:17:56
ping isovax (count 10
Ping R1.2.1: Pinging host ISOVAX (3.1.4.40).  Enter #CP EXT to interrupt.
PING: Ping #1 response took 0.036 seconds.  Successes so far 1.
PING: Ping #2 response took 0.039 seconds.  Successes so far 2.
PING: Ping #3 response took 0.034 seconds.  Successes so far 3.
PING: Ping #4 response took 0.033 seconds.  Successes so far 4.
PING: Ping #5 response took 0.033 seconds.  Successes so far 5.
PING: Ping #6 response took 0.035 seconds.  Successes so far 6.
PING: Ping #7 response took 0.035 seconds.  Successes so far 7.
PING: Ping #8 response took 0.035 seconds.  Successes so far 8.
PING: Ping #9 response took 0.034 seconds.  Successes so far 9.
PING: Ping #10 response took 0.034 seconds.  Successes so far 10.
R; T=0.03/0.09 08:18:11
ping crmvs (count 10
Ping R1.2.1: Pinging host CRMVS (3.1.52.1).  Enter #CP EXT to interrupt.
PING: Ping #1 response took 0.408 seconds.  Successes so far 1.
PING: Ping #2 response took 0.239 seconds.  Successes so far 2.
PING: Ping #3 response took 0.397 seconds.  Successes so far 3.
PING: Ping #4 response took 0.298 seconds.  Successes so far 4.
PING: Ping #5 response took 0.388 seconds.  Successes so far 5.
PING: Ping #6 response took 0.369 seconds.  Successes so far 6.
PING: Ping #7 response took 0.400 seconds.  Successes so far 7.
PING: Ping #8 response took 0.397 seconds.  Successes so far 8.
PING: Ping #9 response took 0.400 seconds.  Successes so far 9.
PING: Ping #10 response took 0.389 seconds.  Successes so far 10.
R; T=0.03/0.09 08:18:38
ping grumpy (count 10
Ping R1.2.1: Pinging host GRUMPY (3.1.5.243).  Enter #CP EXT to interrupt.
PING: Ping #1 response took 0.056 seconds.  Successes so far 1.
PING: Ping #2 response took 0.042 seconds.  Successes so far 2.
PING: Ping #3 response took 0.040 seconds.  Successes so far 3.
PING: Ping #4 response took 0.042 seconds.  Successes so far 4.
PING: Ping #5 response took 0.043 seconds.  Successes so far 5.
PING: Ping #6 response took 0.046 seconds.  Successes so far 6.
PING: Ping #7 response took 0.041 seconds.  Successes so far 7.
PING: Ping #8 response took 0.041 seconds.  Successes so far 8.
PING: Ping #9 response took 0.038 seconds.  Successes so far 9.
PING: Ping #10 response took 0.038 seconds.  Successes so far 10.
R; T=0.03/0.08 08:19:15
cp sp con stop
Don Smith-GE/CIT-CCS

Steve Strickland <SNSTR@TTUVM1.bitnet> (02/23/90)

> Item of interest:  PING times via SNALINK

9370 to vm system ttuvm1 over snalink
9370 to vax system ttacs over ethernet

Ready;
ping ttuvm1.ttu.edu (count 10
Ping R1.2: Pinging host TTUVM1.TTU.EDU (192.58.125.1).  Enter #CP EXT to interru
pt.
PING: Ping #1 response took 0.675 seconds.  Successes so far 1.
PING: Ping #2 response took 0.808 seconds.  Successes so far 2.
PING: Ping #3 response took 0.882 seconds.  Successes so far 3.
PING: Ping #4 response took 0.706 seconds.  Successes so far 4.
PING: Ping #5 response took 0.908 seconds.  Successes so far 5.
PING: Ping #6 response took 1.922 seconds.  Successes so far 6.
PING: Ping #7 response took 1.330 seconds.  Successes so far 7.
PING: Ping #8 response took 1.207 seconds.  Successes so far 8.
PING: Ping #9 response took 1.285 seconds.  Successes so far 9.
PING: Ping #10 response took 0.890 seconds.  Successes so far 10.
Ready;
ping ttacs.ttu.edu (count 10
Ping R1.2: Pinging host TTACS.TTU.EDU (129.118.1.1).  Enter #CP EXT to interrupt
.
PING: Ping #1 response took 0.053 seconds.  Successes so far 1.
PING: Ping #2 response took 0.054 seconds.  Successes so far 2.
PING: Ping #3 response took 0.079 seconds.  Successes so far 3.
PING: Ping #4 response took 0.078 seconds.  Successes so far 4.
PING: Ping #5 response took 0.054 seconds.  Successes so far 5.
PING: Ping #6 response took 0.054 seconds.  Successes so far 6.
PING: Ping #7 response took 0.057 seconds.  Successes so far 7.
PING: Ping #8 response took 0.057 seconds.  Successes so far 8.
PING: Ping #9 response took 0.059 seconds.  Successes so far 9.
PING: Ping #10 response took 0.064 seconds.  Successes so far 10.
Ready;