[net.space] Lunar Explosives

chris@ISM780.UUCP (03/19/85)

Actually the use of explosives on the moon is quite practical.
In a recent response to my original lunar colony note, several
problems were brought up. They included the distance material
is thrown, damage to nearby structures, and safety. It turns
out that modern explosives and techniques are suitable for the
task.

  First, distance material is thrown. A little reflection shows
that the maximum time for particles to land on the moon is twelve
times the time the same particle would take on earth. On earth
very large explosions (strip mining bench blasting) can throw
sizable pieces several hundred yards. Time of flight is on the
order of a second. We won't be using a blast anywhere near as
big. Earth explosions (conventional explosives) don't come anywhere
near to putting stuff in orbit. The 1/6 gravity of the moon is nowhere
near low enough to enable stuff to reach orbital velocity. If we stay
under cover for about 15 seconds (but call it a minute to be safe)
everything will have landed.

  Second, damage to nearby structures. There is a book called
"The Modern Technique of Rock Blasting" published in the early
seventies in Sweden. I read the copy in the UCLA Research Library.
It shows methods for doing precision blasting in areas where fragments
cannot be allowed to fly about. One picture shows a building foundation
being blasted with buildings on either side, literally feet away from
the blasts. The text talks about how to minimize ground shake and
fragment throw. It is quite practical to blast hard rock within feet
of existing structures without damaging them. The text has some
amazing pictures that show rock that looks like it has been sawn
that has really been blasted. It is possible to control explosives
to give very precise results.

  Third, is safety. There are modern explosives that are shock
insensitive to an amazing degree. One result of the nuclear weapons
program was the development of explosives to compress the nuclear
material that would not detonate during an accident. There is
a film that is shown at the Museum in Los Alamos that shows rockets
with cargos of the insensitive explosive impacting concrete walls.
The rocket is destroyed, but the explosive does not detonate.
This explosive is also easily machined, and stores well. It would
be safer to transport than the solid fuel rockets used as kick
motors on satellites.

  The nice thing about explosive digging is that you can move a lot
of material in very short order. With proper precautions it is no
more dangerous than using a catapilar tractor, and much faster.



			chris kostanick
			decvax!vortex!ism780!chris