[comp.sys.amiga.hardware] Poor Labelling of SeaGate Drives

mrush@csuchico.edu (Losing Peer on the Net of Life) (05/08/90)

In article <5699@amiga.UUCP> jimm@superman.UUCP (Jim Mackraz) writes:
>In article <1359@stsci.edu> kyp@stsci.EDU (Mark Kyprianou) writes:
>)I'm planning on buying a 40-50Meg Harddrive.  The drives I've looked at
>)are the Quantum(40Mb), and the Seagate ST-157N(49Mb).   Any suggestions/
>)recommendations concerning these drives or other drives under $400.  Which 
>)drive is more reliable mechanically? MTBF? 
>)
>)I've noticed some advertisements offer a ST-157N-0 or a ST-157N-1, what
>)are the differences?
>
>One of them is as fast as "advertised" and the other is not.  I forget
>which is which, but I got the slow one.  Sent it back and bought

	The ST-157N-0 is the SLOW one.
	The ST-157N-1 is the FAST one.

	A friend and I just recently discovered this little idiosyncracy in
Seagate's naming strategy.

	For those who care, or don't know, the 'N', I'm told, denotes SCSI
interface.

	-- Matt

    *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
    %   I wanna use Virtual Memory to create   %  mrush@csuchico.edu   %
    %   a giant RAM disk!                      %  mrush@cscihp.UUCP    %
    *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
     This is a SCHOOL!  Do you think they even CARE about MY opinions?!