fc@spuxll.UUCP (fc) (05/03/85)
The best argument I can think of to pursuade the non-space-interested citizen that NASA budgets should not be cut is to ask them where we would be today if, in 1492, Queen Isabella had given Columbus's funding to the poor instead. If no-one had funded Columbus (and successors) can you imagine how overcrowded Europe would be today if all the people here of European ancestry were born there instead. Also, look at how many millions of people world-wide are now fed by our huge grain farms both here & in Canada, etc. Who, in 1492, could have imagined 747's capable of delivering 200,000 pounds of food from the US to Africa in half a day? Who, in 1985, can imagine what immense benefits will flow to Earth from Mars, the asteroids, etc. in 500 years?
grl@charm.UUCP (George Lake) (05/07/85)
The implication that NASA budget cuts are to help the poor is ludicrous. Is the military sensitive part of NASA getting cut? NO, Civilian science? of course. Are we increasing benefits to the poor? NO Are we increasing the defense budget?
andrew@orca.UUCP (Andrew Klossner) (05/10/85)
[] "The best argument I can think of to pursuade the non-space-interested citizen that NASA budgets should not be cut is to ask them where we would be today if, in 1492, Queen Isabella had given Columbus's funding to the poor instead. If no-one had funded Columbus (and successors) can you imagine how overcrowded Europe would be today if all the people here of European ancestry were born there instead. Also, look at how many millions of people world-wide are now fed by our huge grain farms both here & in Canada, etc. Who, in 1492, could have imagined 747's capable of delivering 200,000 pounds of food from the US to Africa in half a day? Who, in 1985, can imagine what immense benefits will flow to Earth from Mars, the asteroids, etc. in 500 years?" Columbus was an Italian citizen who couldn't get his government to fund his exploration, so he went to the foreign government of Spain. By analogy, then, Americans seeking funding for space exploration should go to another powerful country. Perhaps Japan. The argument doesn't hold up for other reasons. If Spain had refused Columbus and he had given up, someone else would have come along. Columbus was by no means unique; there were other explorers in that era who had non-government funding. When it's time to railroad, you railroad. Please post articles on this subject to net.space only, leaving net.columbia off the list, as I have. Net.columbia is meant for discussions of on-going space shuttle missions only, and is read by people who want to keep up on day-to-day space operations. -=- Andrew Klossner (decvax!tektronix!orca!andrew) [UUCP] (orca!andrew.tektronix@csnet-relay) [ARPA]