[comp.sys.amiga.hardware] Query: M.A.S.T., Fujitsu, Large capacity disk drives, DATs

dvf@unhd.unh.edu (David V Feldman) (03/06/91)

Greetings,

	I have been thinking for some time about acquiring a very large capacity
	disk drive.  Fujitsu seems to make a 672 Meg drive and even a 1.2 Gig
	drive.  Do they have any competition?  Does anyone have any experience
	with these products?  The only distributor that I am aware of that carries
	these drives is a mail-order firm called M.A.S.T.  I would appreciate
	hearing good or bad from anyone who has ever dealt with them.

	The primary reason I am interested in drives this large is to generate,
	manipulate and play sound samples up to an hour long.  With a little
	effort I have been able to play samples off my 40 meg drive limited only
	by the memory capacity of the drive.  I can't think of any reason why I
	would run into new difficulties with these much larger drives; can 
	anyone else?  I would be interested in hearing from anyone making
	computer music with the Amiga in roughly this way.  I would also be
	happy to share my simple double-buffering program (written in JForth)
	with anyone who wants it.

	Does anyone know a way to interface an Amiga with a DAT?  This is a
	possible less expensive (but less flexible) alternative for me.

	Please reply to D_FELDMAN@UNHH.UNH.EDU .

	Thank you very much in advance.

									David Feldman

blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner) (03/06/91)

dvf@unhd.unh.edu (David V Feldman) writes:
>	I have been thinking for some time about acquiring a very large capacity
>	disk drive.  Fujitsu seems to make a 672 Meg drive and even a 1.2 Gig
>	drive.  Do they have any competition?  Does anyone have any experience
>	with these products?  

I've run both the Fujitsu 1.2 GB and H-P's 1 GB drive on my A3000. The
Fujitsu was considerably faster. DiskSpeed 3.1 reported a peak read
speed of 1.9 megabytes/sec, and the H-P "only" :-) reached 1.5
megabytes/sec. This was on an A3000, you probably won't reach those
speeds on any other controller, but the Hardframe or A2091 should be
fairly close. Both drives have a 2 year warranty as I remember. 
-- 
Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland  580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108
blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com     or    ...dsd.es.com!javelin!blgardne
DoD #0046   My other motorcycle is a Quadracer.         BIX: blaine_g
  Anticipation, anticipation, is making me late, is keeping me waiting.

jgay@digi.lonestar.org (john gay) (03/08/91)

From article <1991Mar6.145948.17848@javelin.es.com>, by blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner):
> Both [fujitsu, hp > 1 GB] drives have a 2 year warranty as I remember. 

Don't know anything as far as the hp drives, but the fujitsu drives have
a 5 (yes, 5) year warranty.  Fujitsu also reports a MTBF of 200,000 hours
(a little less than 23 years).  I don't know how they came up with that figure,
but statics can't lie :) (or can they :)).  There was some guy posting in
misc.forsale.computers (IMHO, inappropriately) who's business sells the fujitsu
drives.  You might look through your archives (it was only a couple weeks
ago) to see if you still have the article (no, we don't have it).

john gay.

hill@evax.arl.utexas.edu (Adam Hill) (03/08/91)

  Advanced Storage Systems here in Dallas have played with a DAT, I
have NO idea if they got it working. Adv. Storage makes the NEXUS SCSI
card.

  A CDTV developer (Scott Lamb) has a 1.2G MiniScribe and has had no
problems (Besides formatting - You need a *BIG* bitmap for the initial
format, A small gotcha). He gets 1.9Megs/sec on a Hardframe. It uses
so much DMA bandwidth in that mode as to "artifact" the screen,
because the Amiga runs out of DMA time to refresh the screen :-)

  HP has a 5 year warranty as well.... Seems you can't loose with BIG drives.
-- 
 adam hill --  hill@evax.uta.edu
     I programmed for three days          Make Up Your Own Mind.. AMIGA!
     And heard no human voices.              Amiga... Multimedia NOW!  
     But the hard disk sang. - TZoP              Born To Run SVR4

dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au (Andrew Clayton) (03/08/91)

In article <1991Mar7.191718.8668@digi.lonestar.org>, john gay writes:

> From article <1991Mar6.145948.17848@javelin.es.com>, by blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner):
> > Both [fujitsu, hp > 1 GB] drives have a 2 year warranty as I remember. 
> 
> Don't know anything as far as the hp drives, but the fujitsu drives have
> a 5 (yes, 5) year warranty.  Fujitsu also reports a MTBF of 200,000 hours
> (a little less than 23 years).  I don't know how they came up with that figure,
> but statics can't lie :) (or can they :)).

Statics can't lie, unless you recompile them with a different
value. :-)

Dac
--
David Andrew Clayton. // _l _  _ dac@prolix.pub.uu.oz.au    *or*|I post.I am.
Canberra, Australia.\X/ (_](_l(_ ccadfa.cc.adfa.oz.au!prolix!dac@munnari.oz

blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner) (03/09/91)

jgay@digi.lonestar.org (john gay) writes:

>From article <1991Mar6.145948.17848@javelin.es.com>, by blgardne@javelin.es.com (Blaine Gardner):
>> Both [fujitsu, hp > 1 GB] drives have a 2 year warranty as I remember. 

>Don't know anything as far as the hp drives, but the fujitsu drives have
>a 5 (yes, 5) year warranty.  Fujitsu also reports a MTBF of 200,000 hours
>(a little less than 23 years).  I don't know how they came up with that figure,
>but statics can't lie :) (or can they :)).

That's right, 5 years. I think the H-P is also 5 years. As to the MTBF
figure, I had the H-P die on me after a couple hundred hours. I'd say
the warranty carries a whole lot more weight than any overinflated MTBF
numbers. Both are nice drives, but I'd buy the Fujitsu myself because
it's faster, cheaper, and a little bigger.
-- 
Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland  580 Arapeen Drive, SLC, Utah 84108
blgardne@javelin.sim.es.com     or    ...dsd.es.com!javelin!blgardne
DoD #0046   My other motorcycle is a Quadracer.         BIX: blaine_g
  Anticipation, anticipation, is making me late, is keeping me waiting.

tucker@tahoe.unr.edu (Aaron Tucker) (03/09/91)

Fujitsu drives offer not only a 5 year warranty, but they have a 1 800
number for thier drives over 600MB. You call this number after a failure,
and they will have a replacement to you within 24 hours.

How's that for customer service!  M.A.S.T. is running a 1.2G drive in thier
BBS...they are planning to fill it up with lots of 768x480x24 pictures
for Colorburst customers.


Juan Trevino
Modern Media

"Why try HAM-E or DCTV when they're not even 24bit?
Go for the real thing...COlorburst or Firecracker"

jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) (03/26/91)

In article <1991Mar8.085326.27349@evax.arl.utexas.edu> hill@evax.arl.utexas.edu (Adam Hill) writes:
>  A CDTV developer (Scott Lamb) has a 1.2G MiniScribe and has had no
>problems (Besides formatting - You need a *BIG* bitmap for the initial
>format, A small gotcha). He gets 1.9Megs/sec on a Hardframe. It uses

	The ST1480N gets about 2MB/s through the FS under diskspeed in the
earlier portions of the disk (zone recorded drives get slower on higher
cylinders, since there are less sectors per cylinder).  Nice drive (4400 rpm,
400+MB, 3.5").  I like it.  ;-)

>so much DMA bandwidth in that mode as to "artifact" the screen,
>because the Amiga runs out of DMA time to refresh the screen :-)

	That shouldn't happen!  (Right, dave?)  Screen refresh has higher
priority than most anything, I thought.  (Maybe if they hold the bus too
long...  ah, too much hardware for me. ;-)

-- 
Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Thus spake the Master Ninjei: "To program a million-line operating system
is easy, to change a man's temperament is more difficult."
(From "The Zen of Programming")  ;-)

FelineGrace@cup.portal.com (Dana B Bourgeois) (03/30/91)

OK, now *I* have a question on very large drives.  Over in the Sun
thread a warning was posted recently about Unix SCSI drivers not
handling drives larger than about 1.07 Gig. properly.  I called Sun
and they confirmed they don't support drives larger than 669 Meg but
they are working on a new driver that will fix the problem and will
probably be selling the larger SCSI drives themselves Real Soon Now.

I believe Randall said Amiga has no problem with very large SCSI drives
but perhaps we could hear it just One More Time?  How big a partition
can FFS support?  OFS?

Dana Bourgeois @ cup.portal.com

"My drive is so big..."
"(unison) How big is it???"
"It's *soooo* big that only an Amiga can format it!!!"

sck@watson.ibm.com (Scott C. Kennedy) (03/31/91)

Dana,

   Although I'm not from Commodore I have taken several X-Lrg capacity
drives homes, and formatted them on the Amiga. I currently have several
300 MB partitions on a 1.6 GB drive, and have had no problems. Note: I am
using a 2091 (great job guys!) and the drives are Seagte Elite ST1600N. As a
side point, when I asked what a good partition size was for the Amiga, I was
told by several people that 50-70 MB is optimal, though I have not seen any
speed differences due to partition size, except for having the Amiga draw 96
disk icons on boot. ( I have had 3 of these monsters on my Amy at once, but
my management made me stop :( ) Currently, I am using my Amiga to diagnose
possibly defective drives for the Unix boxes here @ research because it is
the most forgiving and user-friendly scsi machines that I have at my
disposal.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott C. Kennedy (sck@watson.ibm.com)     | "All we are saying ...
Distributed High Performance Computing    |  is give peace a chance..." 
I.B.M. Thomas J. Watson Research Facility | John Lennon - Dec. 8, 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott C. Kennedy (sck@watson.ibm.com)     | "All we are saying ...
Distributed High Performance Computing    |  is give peace a chance..." 
I.B.M. Thomas J. Watson Research Facility | John Lennon - Dec. 8, 1980
------------------------------------------------------------------------

jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com (Randell Jesup) (04/02/91)

In article <40684@cup.portal.com> FelineGrace@cup.portal.com (Dana B Bourgeois) writes:
>OK, now *I* have a question on very large drives.  Over in the Sun
>thread a warning was posted recently about Unix SCSI drivers not
>handling drives larger than about 1.07 Gig. properly.  I called Sun
>and they confirmed they don't support drives larger than 669 Meg but
>they are working on a new driver that will fix the problem and will
>probably be selling the larger SCSI drives themselves Real Soon Now.
>
>I believe Randall said Amiga has no problem with very large SCSI drives
>but perhaps we could hear it just One More Time?  How big a partition
>can FFS support?  OFS?

	The current A590/A2091/A3000 scsi drivers have the same 1gig
limit Sun (I think) and Dec (both VMS and Ultrix) hit - we don't check the
block address for whether it fits in a 6-byte read.  The next general A3000
release should support it.  I suspect most or all 3rd party SCSI drivers
have the same problem currently (at least we're in good company here, Sun,
Dec, etc).

	If you low-level format with direct scsi commands for larger logical
blocks, you should be able to handle up to 2 gig with 1024 byte logical SCSI
blocks.  HDToolbox can't do this, though once you get it changed it should
work ok (we've tested it with things like Magneto-Optical disks with 1K
blocks, and steve has tested it a bunch I think).

-- 
Randell Jesup, Keeper of AmigaDos, Commodore Engineering.
{uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!jesup, jesup@cbmvax.commodore.com  BIX: rjesup  
Disclaimer: Nothing I say is anything other than my personal opinion.
Thus spake the Master Ninjei: "To program a million-line operating system
is easy, to change a man's temperament is more difficult."
(From "The Zen of Programming")  ;-)