d88-psm@sm.luth.se (04/26/91)
In article <1991Apr21.223326.46280@vaxb.acs.unt.edu>, wright@etsuv2.etsu.edu >Yes, two of them. Amiga Real-Time monitor and Xoper. I believe they are >both written by the same person. ARTM is a more point and click type thing >and Xoper is more CLI (typing) type. Both are good, but I think Xoper has A few weeks ago I posted a question about Xoper. I got a mail answer from Finland, amongst others. Can't remember his name, but he told me Xoper measures the number of times a program/task starts and not how much CPU-time it uses. This was the explanation for input.device taking 47% of CPU-time when running 100% load. If I run MandFXP (for example) it is interrupted by input.device and then started again. Xoper then tells me both take about 47 %. But running AIBB2 (Fish I think) I can tell that the system takes 3% CPU-time under 100% CPU-load. If I move my mouse around, it takes another 10% giving the running program only 87%. Still it shows Xoper (2.2) is useless for measuring each tasks amount of CPU-time. /Peter ---===***===--- Peter Sjostrom INTERNET: d88-psm@sm.luth.se PHONE: +46 920 67653 Vanortsv 5:13 UUCP: {uunet,mcvax}!sunic.se!sigma.sm.luth.se!d88-psm S-951 65 Lulea "It will be a relief to become old. To be young was too Sweden disgusting." - Hjalmar Soderberg (Swedish writer/poet) ---===***===---