IO91461@MAINE.BITNET (Tom Nezwek) (05/04/91)
Its real nice but the scsi host is slower than my hardframe 2000.
I get 700k read/550k write with the HF with a 64k cache.
The GVP (with the same drive/partition) gets only 500k read / 400k write.
Oh well.. -Hope this helps the speed Demon's like me out there in netland.
-Tomrbabel@babylon.rmt.sub.org (Ralph Babel) (05/07/91)
In article <91123.155208IO91461@MAINE.BITNET>, IO91461@MAINE.BITNET (Tom Nezwek) writes: > Its real nice but the scsi host is slower than my hardframe 2000. > I get 700k read/550k write with the HF with a 64k cache. > The GVP (with the same drive/partition) gets only 500k read / 400k write. Make sure you set the Mask parameter to 0xFFFFFFFE. See pages 26-28 of GVP's manual for details. Ralph
IO91461@MAINE.BITNET (Tom Nezwek) (05/08/91)
Yes I did set the mask.. (I also read the manual quite extensively)
To the person who suggested this: What did U get for speeds?
BTW My figures were with a real-life situation: the partion was about 50% full
I didn't want to test on a blank partition (even though that yeilds better
results) because you don't use an empty hd but one with some software on
it..
-Tom Nezwek