IO91461@MAINE.BITNET (Tom Nezwek) (05/04/91)
Its real nice but the scsi host is slower than my hardframe 2000. I get 700k read/550k write with the HF with a 64k cache. The GVP (with the same drive/partition) gets only 500k read / 400k write. Oh well.. -Hope this helps the speed Demon's like me out there in netland. -Tom
rbabel@babylon.rmt.sub.org (Ralph Babel) (05/07/91)
In article <91123.155208IO91461@MAINE.BITNET>, IO91461@MAINE.BITNET (Tom Nezwek) writes: > Its real nice but the scsi host is slower than my hardframe 2000. > I get 700k read/550k write with the HF with a 64k cache. > The GVP (with the same drive/partition) gets only 500k read / 400k write. Make sure you set the Mask parameter to 0xFFFFFFFE. See pages 26-28 of GVP's manual for details. Ralph
IO91461@MAINE.BITNET (Tom Nezwek) (05/08/91)
Yes I did set the mask.. (I also read the manual quite extensively) To the person who suggested this: What did U get for speeds? BTW My figures were with a real-life situation: the partion was about 50% full I didn't want to test on a blank partition (even though that yeilds better results) because you don't use an empty hd but one with some software on it.. -Tom Nezwek