[rec.audio.high-end] Kennedy's Newsletter Part II

aboulang@BBN.COM (Albert Boulanger) (05/29/90)

A friend of mine is producing a high end audio newsletter. Please, if
you have comments, write to him directly. This is Part 2 of Issue 1:

     The First Newsletter-Continued           Kennedy Audio Laboratories
                                              TEL:(508)441-1010
       In this extended newsletter I'll go a little further into detail 
    on some of the topics covered in the earlier newsletter. Without much 
    further ado here we go....

       I guess most people already know that most tubes need to burn in for a 
    period of time before their characteristics are fully stabilized...
    In pre-amplifiers this means that the re-tubed unit may not sound very 
    good for the first 30-100 hours of operation. In power amplifiers this 
    means that the output stage bias and A.C balance (if so equipped) should 
    be checked and re-adjusted if necessary after about 15 hours of operation 
    and checked on a regular basis thereafter. I surmise that part of this may 
    have to do with the getter removing the last vestiges of gas from the tube 
    and the cathode burning off any impurities/contamination in its coating.

       Unlike many I do not recommend leaving ANY tube gear on continuously
    24 hours a day because the transformers and other components in commercially
    made and particularly vintage gear are NOT designed for continuous
    duty, and at the very least you run the risk of overheating .... In one
    case a gentleman called me asking what to do after his old Scott 299D blew
    up, unfortunately for him the power transformer shorted out, due to excess
    -ive heat build up deteriorating the insulation. The whole unit was cooked
    inside from long exposure to heat even though he did leave enough space to
    allow for cooling. I have heard many other stories of this ilk over the
    years, and a further sobering thought concerns safety. Power amplifiers
    have relatively large power supplies and faults here could potentially
    result in a fire if the failure did not cause the line fuse to blow immed
    -iately. So for your safety please don't leave the stuff on unattended and 
    disconnect it from the AC line when you vacation. ( This tip comes straight
    from my own experience, as my childhood lab was struck by lightening and
    the few items connected to the AC line were ruined.)

       I have recently learned to my chagrin that cables really do make a big
    difference to the sound quality of my system (all tube), although I heard 
    audible differences between cables for several years prior to now, I just 
    didn't feel that the high cost of cables, both speaker and interconnect,
    were justified. On the advice of friends who I have since set straight I 
    tried every cheap trick in the book... Some things seemed to help, I even 
    tried using 300 ohm antenna wire as an interconnect between my amp. and 
    pre-amp., believe it or not this was an improvement over the Gold-ens I 
    was using. Speaker wire was some old and crudy Monster cable. The system 
    was an endless source of frustration to me and I finally traced a lot of 
    it back to the cables. I still make my own interconnects and have found 
    that Monster Powerline 3 makes a very good, if unwieldy interconnect- My 
    thanks to Rich Vogel for the tip and the cable to try this out.(Your pre-
    amp must have a low output z in order not to degrade the signal via noise 
    pick up as this wire is not shielded.)

    In addition I'm now using a really decent speaker cable made by Signature,
    known as Signature Apature 500 and I can really tell the difference. I 
    think there are many cables out there for $3.00 a ft or so that are quite 
    excellent. I don't think the differences are subtle enough to be missed, 
    and not all cables are equally good in all applications, so if at all 
    possible try a loaner pair before you buy.

       If you're at all like me you may have to live within tight budget 
    constraints, but you shouldn't let this prevent you from enjoying very 
    good sound quality. There are many pieces of vintage audio gear available 
    for a song that can be modified for really great improvements in their 
    performance.
    
    UNDER $200.00 COMPONENTS
       Old Scott, Fisher and Dynaco integrated tube amps are cheap 
    to purchase and lend themselves to modification and enhancement.
    The same can be said of the less expensive tuners made by these companies.
    In fact the Dynaco FM-3 has to represent just about the best audible
    performance for the money- It outperforms many much more expensive tuners.
    Scott made several models that can be had for a song, including the 350
    series (avoid the 350D), the LT-110 which was a kit and came in 3 versions
    over the course of several years and can be great to terrible depending on 
    who built it-PLEASE remove the bottom cover on these and check for good 
    workmanship. Almost any good tube tuner will sound better than any of
    today's solid state tuners and for less money.    

    UNDER $400.00 COMPONENTS
       For a little more money separates become quite feasible, in fact you 
    should be able to purchase a clean Dyna Stereo-70 for approx. $150.00 and 
    a PAS-3 for much less, but the stock PAS-3 pre-amp is no bargain sonically
    as it lacks detail, good control of the bass, and worst of all has a 
    terrible phase and frequency response anomaly right in the mid-range. I 
    have an inexpensive mod to address these issues. (See flyer on PAS)
    Other rarer but worthwhile models are the Eico HF-30 mono pwr amps which 
    can be converted to triode mode operation for a big improvement; the Eico
    HF-60 which uses EL-34/6CA7 output tubes and is considered a gem by many 
    collectors; the Dyna ST-35 stereo pwr amp considered ideal by many for 
    driving the Quad ESL loudspeaker. The best tuner in this category has to 
    be the Fisher FM-200B featuring excellent R.F performance, good AFC, 
    and effective muting. Needless to say even stock the sound quality is very 
    good indeed and really spectacular with some trivial modifications. This 
    is one of my favorite tuners at any price.....
    Another surprisingly good tuner at this price is the rare and almost 
    unknown Eico Classic Series 2200 Stereo Tuner, don't be put off by its 
    almost klunky appearance, it's a winner. Scott made several good sounding,
    difficult to repair, and fairly unreliable stereo tuners. The best of the 
    lot was the 310E and this is definitely worth having if you can find it 
    for under $300.00, it features adjustable muting threshold, stereo/mono
    switching in a strikingly handsome package.  


    OVER $400.00 COMPONENTS 
       In the rarer and more expensive categories you can find the Marantz
    8B stereo pwr amp. which has triode output option priced anywhere from 
    $400.00 to $1000.00; the McIntosh MC-30, MC-60 both featuring cathode
    coupled output stages and unusually complex driver circuits for their
    time along with good sound at a price ranging from $500.00 pair for the
    30's to $800.00 a pair for really mint 60's; the Fisher SA-1000, the 
    Fisher K-1000 (same as SA-1000 except that it was a kit) which was the
    first commercial amp to utilize 8417 output tubes and produced the then 
    astronomical output power of 75 watts per channel at a price of around 
    $1000.00 for a mint unit;; the Harmon-Kardon Citation II which operates
    in limited class A using KT88/6550's run at their absolute limit so that
    they eat inferior output tubes for breakfast, and my favorite vintage amp
    because of its stunning performance when treated to component upgrades.
    This amp was recently available for as low as $200.00 in non functional 
    condition, but has started to appreciate rapidly and I expect mint units
    to sell for about $1000.00 by year's end.All of these operate their outputs
    in ultra-linear mode, an important consideration for low distorsion. Also
    in this category is the Scott LK-150 which I feel is the most over-rated amp
    in existance, it is probably the most expensive and sounds little 
    different than the Dyna Stereo-70 at about 7-8 times the price. Also Scott 
    never received a license to use the ultra-linear circuit and consequently
    none of their amplifiers have it....  Tuners worth your consideration at
    this level would be the Marantz 10B at about $1000.00-$1400.00, widely 
    considered to be the ultimate tuner ever made; the McIntosh MR-71 at about 
    $600.00 which I have owned for 7 years, have extensively modified and will 
    not part with until the day I die; and the McIntosh MR-65B which 
    electrically is close to the MR-71 and sells for less than $300.00 in 
    many cases and is very popular with a number of my friends.
    In this price category you probably should be looking for a new pre-amp. 
    because the vintage designs are so euphonic that every source tends to 
    sound the same. Stay away from any Scott pre-amps of this vintage as they 
    are REALLY TERRIBLE! If you must have a vintage unit only the Marantz 7C
    is worth considering and expect to pay a lot for it.

    OVER $2000.00 COMPONENTS
       In the ultimate price is no object category you'll find the Marantz 9 
    power amplifier, all versions of which feature gorgeous appearance and
    build quality as well as good sound. This unit mates magically with the
    Quad ESL-63 electro-static loudspeaker, but in my limited experience not 
    so well with most dynamic types. The unit features parallel push-pull EL-
    34/6CA7 output tubes with switch selectable triode or ultra-linear 
    operation. The small signal/driver circuitry utilizes 6DJ8's which must be 
    selected with care for optimum sonics. In New England these amps typically 
    sell for over $6500.00 a pair and I've heard of people asking $10,000.00
    for a really mint pair. ( I don't know whether anyone but the Japanese 
    would pay these prices-I have a friend who paid only $400.00 a few years 
    ago for a pair of these.)
    I don't know of any other components in this price range except possibly 
    some complete Western Electric speaker systems.
    
    VINTAGE TURNTABLES
       The only turntables I know of that are worth messing around with
    are the Lenco and the AR. I know virtually nothing about the Lenco
    and haven't seen one in over 10 years. The AR on the other hand is very
    common and came in several versions starting with the XA. Stay away from
    the 2 motor versions. This table is the basis of almost all High-End
    turntables made today. Even with the stock arms these tables will blow the
    doors off of most inexpensive Japanese tables sonically. The XB is similar
    to the XA except that it has a cueing mechanism, but both of these tables
    have rather high arm mass so low compliance moving magnet cartridges are
    the best here. I would recommend that the interconnect cables be replaced
    as the originals are terrible. AR still provides replacement parts for
    these tables, and Underground Sound of Memphis, Tenn. has Merrill
    sub-chassis for upgrading and installing modern arms on these tables.
    A modified AR probably provides the most cost effective route to a high
    performance turntable.

    MISC.
       I hope this letter has provided you with some useful information on 
    vintage audio gear. I refurbish and modify most everything listed in this 
    letter and a lot of this gear can provide stunning performance with 
    the right mods. Vintage gear represents a good value for the money and 
    some of it may even have good investment value.