[net.space] Comments on Mr Sarfatti's post

FIRTH@TL-20B.ARPA (12/04/85)

[Moderator - feel free to condense, edit, discard, &c]

Some brief comments on Mr Sarfatti's message:

(1) please could we have some references?  His text was highly condensed.


(2) "	Fiber bundles generalize the Cartesian product 
	of linear spaces to include global twists. For example,
	a cylinder is the Cartesian product of a circle base
	space with an untwisted line segment fiber.  But, the
	nonorientable Mobius strip has the same base space and
	the same fiber with a global twist. "

    When I follow these instructions, I get a cross-cap, not a
    Moebius strip.  Have I goofed?


(3) "	Thus, physics is geometrodynamical fulfilling Einstein's Vision. "

    Sorry, I don't understand this.  Einstein envisaged a single tensor
    equation that would comprehend all the basic interaction forces.
    The theory proposed here seems to make each force a special case,
    described by a particular gauge transformation.

(4) "	The electromagnetic U(1)spherical S(1) fibered vacuum is only the 
	first approximation to the real vacuum...

	The second approximation would be the nonabelian U(1)xSU(2) 
	electroweak gauge bundle [S(1)xS(2) spherical fiber] ... "

    But, as Dirac pointed out [PAM Dirac, Principles of Quantum Mecahnics,
    4th Ed, Oxford, MCMLVIII], these models lead to divergent integrals
    for the vacuum state.  It is therefore hardly fair to call them
    "approximations" - they are fundamentally defective.

(5) "	Supergravity is the local gauge force induced by supersymmetry that 
	causes fermion/boson transitions which were previously thought to be 
	impossible because of a superselection rule. Two supersymmetry
	transformations yield a translation in space-time. This may lead
	to some sort of hyperdrive. "

    But the Boson -> Fermion transition seems irreversible.  If so, then
    the translation is impossible, and (alas) no hyperdrive that way.

(5) "	Stimulated beta decay, if it can be induced, would be a new
	alternate propulsion energy source "

    Yes. Basically, if we can convert matter into antimatter, then we
    can build a total conversion energy source, by converting half the
    matter, and letting the other half annihilate it.  (Containing such
    a reaction is merely a matter of engineering!).  Unfortunately, it
    seems today that you can stimulate beta decay only by energising the
    particle by substantially more than its rest mass, ie you have to put
    more energy into the thing than you get out.

(6) "	First order vacuum to vacuum phase transitions triggered by an 
	external magnetic field from a space-based superconducting magnet
	might provide an alternate SDI space weapon and propulsion energy
	source suitable for interstellar voyages. "

    Please don't!  The magnetic flux required to render the vacuum unstable
    is rather inconveniently large - enough to rip apart any ordinary matter.
    (I calculate ~10**28 Gauss but may, as ever, have goofed)

(7) "	There are closed forms that are not exact and cycles that are
	not boundaries. "

    I don't know enough to dispute this.  But, if it's true, then
    Caratheodory's Principle fails, and almost all of thermodynamics
    collapses.  In particular, if the thermodynamic equation of state
    is not an integrable Pfaffian, then even the First Law cannot be
    proved: a fluid mass could be partitioned into two parts, with
    greater aggregate thermal energy than the combination.

(8) "	Wick rotations change the signature of the space-time metric from 
	hyperbolic to elliptic. Indeed, my studies of the Dirac equation
	suggest not only bradyon and tachyon free particle spinor solutions
	inside and outside the light cone, respectively, but also, as noted
	above, "Wickyon" solutions that quantum tunnel through the light
	cone from subluminal to superluminal speed with a finite expenditure
	of energy. "

    They aren't rotations, but reflections of the wave functions in the
    light cone, ie in the plane x=ct.  Naturally, this transforms space-
    like into time-like coordinates, and subluminal into supraluminal
    particles.  The basic form of the space-time substrate remains the
    same, but of course if you change the axes, then an ellipse (closed
    along the time axis) becomes an hyperbola (open along the space axis)
    Unless I've missed something, this is not useful.

    References would be VERY helpful here, since I'm not aware of any
    particle that can spontaneously tunnel through the light cone.
    There are cases where subluminal and supraluminal particles are
    correlated (eg after muon-nutrino decay). 

(9) "	Aspect's Paris experiment shows the reality of nonlocal photon spin-
	spin quantum correlations over faster than light space-like
	separations between the detections of photons emitted in a
	double quantum jump. "

    Not a fair presentation.  The experiment shows, that if one of two
    correlated photons is perturbed, the other changes state in a manner
    that implies awareness of the perturbation.  To an external observer,
    the photons may be some distance apart.  But to an observer on one of
    the photons, they are still in contact (Lorentz equation), and so it
    is not anomalous that one should affect the other.

------

Robert Firth

-------