peter@versatc.versatec.com (Peter Tapscott) (11/21/90)
In the past year I have extensively modified a pair of JBL large floor speakers with Focal tweeters, and complete new crossovers. This mod was made after reading a Speaker Builder article on mods to smaller JBLs. Later the JBLs were damaged (torn spider), so I took the opportunity to buy new speakers. But they had to be a lot better than the JBLs, or I wan't interested. I extensively auditioned the three speakers, old modified JBLs, B&W Matrix 3s, and Vandersteen 2cis. Some thoughts follow on the 2ci vs Matrix 3 camparison. depth: V = behind the speakers, B&W at the speakers I think it is this strange "depth" sensation that makes some people not like the Vandys. I didn't have a problem with it, but preferred the more "upfront" sound of some other speakers. I liked the sound of the Vandys better on rock music with the midrange adjusted a bit hotter. pinpointing objects on soundstage: slight nod to B&W detail: high, lows, mid B&W always showed more detail. This was only noticeable on those recordings that HAD tiny details. It was surprising to hear, very clearly, details that were completely missing from the Vandys. Certain opera recordings showed this. Also, "Ghost Train" from the Flying Cowboys album by Rickie Lee Jones -- there are a lot of people calling in the background. I only heard one on the JBLs and three on the Vandys. bass: the Vandersteens seem to reach deeper, but there was more detail on the B&Ws. The B&Ws seemed boomy until I put them on spiked feet. (I guess my softwood floor resonates easily.) I was surprised at the change in sound due to the spikes. Both the 2cis and the B&Ws have controlled bass. I add a homemade subwoofer driven by a 200W amp when I want throbbing bass, like at parties. voice: B&W, every time. 2cis weren't bad, but didn't sound as lifelike as the B&Ws. Rock & electric jazz: slight nod to Vandersteens Acoustic jazz: fine details on B&W gives them the nod. volume: the JBLs rein supreme. Their big woofers on cast aluminum frames put out a lot of sound. The B&Ws are less efficient, so I won't use them to play at a party. The 2cis are very inefficient. While I never clipped the ADCOM GFA555, my little radio shack meters showed a LOT of power to sustain a loud, but unobtrusive sound. Peaks were frequently about 200 watts (though these meters are not calibrated.) My concern about volume is that I don't want to damage the speakers by feeding them 200 watts on a consistant basis. visual: sometimes called the WAF, the visual impact of the Vandersteens is awful. These are clearly speakers built by an engineer to achieve a sonic purpose. They are very successful at achieving their sonic purpose, but visually they remain a pair of large black monoliths. I believe in function over form, but the function better be clearly better to justify this form. The B&Ws present a less intimidating face: they are only about 11" wide, and gain volume with a long depth dimension. They are about a foot lower than the Vandys on stands. They have spiked feet that so not require additional stands. Price: The JBL mod cost about $200. They are still the best party speaker, but now have OK imaging that they didn't before the mods. Much smoother now, and the Focal tweeters are supurb. The Vandersteen 2cis were about $1100, with Sound Anchors, on sale. This is a GREAT price for these speakers, so I was ready to love them at home. B&W Martix 3 were about $2500 list, somewhat lower on sale, but much more than $1100. Conclusions: I took the Vandersteens back to the dealer. I would have liked to audition other speakers, especially the Swan IVs. I was ready to buy Magneplanar IIIs, but the setup sounded awful. If it had sounded great, I may have bought them. I also listened to Apogees (the new small ones, I forgot the model): very nice sound, but the "sweet spot" is about the size of a football. If you move even several inches, the sound changes. The "beaming-est" sepaker I have ever heard. -- |----------------------------------------------------------------------| | Peter Tapscott {ames|apple|leadsv|pyramid|sun}!versatc!peter | | Versatec, 2805 Bowers Avenue, Santa Clara, Calif (408)982-4235 | |----------------------------------------------------------------------|