[bit.listserv.christia] Canonized Saints - KEG

GATLING@SUVM (Keith E Gatling) (01/15/90)

Donna, I hope you won't mind a Lutheran adding to what you were saying before
about the canonized saints.  I think this might clear up some more confusion
that many non-Catholics have about the issue.

    A while back someone on the list made a comment about the "Catholic
    saints" or something similar to that.  It may even be the post to
    which Donna was responding.  Waiting for someone else to respond (I
    get so tired of being one of the only non-Catholics to ever try to
    explain this stuff to the rest of you), I forgot all about it until
    now.  However, no one has yet done it, and so I shall do it now.

    Contrary to popular belief (even among some Catholics), the Catholic
    church has NEVER said "X is a saint, Y isn't."  What they have said
    is something roughly equivilant to "This is a person that we're pretty
    sure must have made it," but they have never said that a particular
    person was condemned to Hell.  Excommunicated, maybe...but that's an-
    other issue altogether, and only of consequence in this world.
         It is also important to note that when the Catholic church canon-
    izes William of Lawrence as a saint, but fails to do the same for Lauren
    of Delaware, it is not saying that she is not a saint.  It is merely
    saying that there is insufficient evidence for them to say that she
    definitely is.
         It's sort of like the Academy Awards in that in popular opinion
    you're a loser if you didn't get the Oscar.  Yet people tend to forget
    that you had to be pretty good to get a nomination in the first place.

I hope this clears things up a bit.

keg

JIM@AUVM (Jim McIntosh) (01/16/90)

In article <CHRISTIA%90011505152766@FINHUTC>, Keith E Gatling <GATLING@SUVM>
says:
>         It is also important to note that when the Catholic church canon-
>    izes William of Lawrence as a saint, but fails to do the same for Lauren
>    of Delaware, it is not saying that she is not a saint.  It is merely
>    saying that there is insufficient evidence for them to say that she
>    definitely is.

It is also interesting to note  that only Catholics (and usually Clery or
Religious) seem  to get canonized by  the Roman Catholic Church,  but few
would say that  only Catholics are saved. Probably the  best way to think
about "Catholic Saints" is to think of them as people the RCC is pointing
out to Catholics as good role models.
-------
Jim McIntosh (JIM@AUVM)
The American University
Washington DC 20016 USA