[bit.listserv.novell] Ethernet Specifications

aar_osman@GSBACD.UCHICAGO.EDU (02/02/90)

The cable length, cable-type, etc. seems to depend on the tolerances of the
transceiver.  We found that the 3-Com transceivers will tolerate many
standards violations such as length, transceiver spacing, and even putting
T-stubs on the thin-net cable segments.  This applies to 3-Com's external
transceiver for attachment to thick segments as well as their on-board thinnet
transceiver.


If you stretch the 3-Com boards to the limit, you will start getting "dribble
errors" or "too many collissions" when you run 3C501 diagnostics.  However, if
they pass diagnostics, it is a good bet that 3-plus will work.  Howevers,
Novell seems to be more sensitive to packet losses and Netware workstations
may still time-out with the all too familiar "server not found" message.

Western Digital boards, on the other hand, are less tolerant to cable spec
violations.  WD diagnostics will often fail in such a LAN even though your
board-level diagnostics will pass if you add a fully terminated T-connecter
to the board.  However, we have seen that Novell shell will run without
problems even though you cannot get the diagnostics to fly.

I hope this partially answers Dave Molta's inquiry on the real-world
Ethernet specs.

/Osman

Voice: 312-567-6751