postmaster@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU (02/26/90)
After reading some responses I received, I understand and support the creation of rec.radio.noncomm. I hope I will not be labeled or flamed for my first response. I just have seen so many "trivial" proposals for niche' newsgroups that can be included in rec.radio.shortwave. It just seems that maybe rec.radio.shortwave should have been named rec.radio.listening to tie all the splinters together. If it has to do with radio listening, JUST POST IT ! I would like to thank all those who wrote me, not *FLAME* me. I misunderstood the true intent. Chris