khl@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Kenneth H. Lee) (01/10/90)
Just checking to make sure I can do this... Kenneth H. Lee khl@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu Columbia University rutgers!columbia!cunixf!khl 209 Watson, 612 West 115 Street khlcu@cuvmc.bitnet New York, NY 10025 (212) 854-8027
kfw@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Kin F Wong) (01/11/90)
This is, of course, a test. Please ignore. -- Kin F. Wong INTERNET: kfw@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu UUCP : columbia!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!kfw Now I lay me down to sleep, I pray the double lock will keep; May no brick through the window break and no one rob me till I awake. Kin F. Wong INTERNET: kfw@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu UUCP : columbia!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!kfw Now I lay me down to sleep, I pray the double lock will keep; May no brick through the window break and no one rob me till I awake.
tale@cs.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) (01/11/90)
In <2606@cunixc.cc.columbia.edu> kfw@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Kin F Wong):
> This is, of course, a test. Please ignore.
Sorry, no can do.
What the hell is going on here? NONE of these test messages fit
within the charter of the group. Get a clue; if you're going to test
at least use a bloody damn "local" distribution!! [... and expect
more flames if it still shows up in the rest of the altnet ...]
--
(setq mail '("tale@cs.rpi.edu" "tale@ai.mit.edu" "tale@rpitsmts.bitnet"))
esj@bikini.cis.ufl.edu (Eric S. Johnson) (01/11/90)
In just about every article in this group, Everyone writes: > >This is, of course, a test. Please ignore. > This is, of course, getting silly. Perhaps we should rename this group alt.test.moderated. And anyway, real hackers never test. Thats what software engineering weenies are for... Ej