Slocum.CSCDA@HI-MULTICS.ARPA (Brett Slocum) (02/28/86)
I was not aware of the requirement for presenting complete scientific evidence to back up all statements on this mailing list. I will rectify this in the future, and I will expect all participates to do likewise. Thank you. Brett Slocum P.S. Yes, I know. More Sarcasm.
wdm@PUR-EE.UUCP (Tex) (03/03/86)
In article <860228151236.353975@HI-MULTICS.ARPA> you write: >I was not aware of the requirement for presenting complete scientific >evidence to back up all statements on this mailing list. I will rectify >this in the future, and I will expect all participates to do likewise. >Thank you. > >Brett Slocum > >P.S. Yes, I know. More Sarcasm. Be serious; "complete scientific evidence" is hardly a requirement, but when you post something really stupid, expect people to react as if it is really stupid. Predicting several tens of thousands of deaths as the result of a shuttle explosion falls in the category of "really stupid."
cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) (03/04/86)
> I was not aware of the requirement for presenting complete scientific > evidence to back up all statements on this mailing list. I will rectify > this in the future, and I will expect all participates to do likewise. > Thank you. > > Brett Slocum > > P.S. Yes, I know. More Sarcasm. No, the only requirement is to use your brain before posting things that are utterly implausible. (Like one pound of plutonium killing every person on Earth.)