Pat.Goltz@f3.n300.z1.fidonet.org (Pat Goltz) (02/10/90)
Index Number: 6643 This is actually a response to the lady who had the very young son (3 or so) who was reading on the third grade level but had dyslexia. I had to log off yesterday before I got a chance to reply. It is normal for a person of 3 to reverse words like "saw" and "was". And I don't regard it as a sign of dyslexia even in older children. It is only a problem if they reverse everything, consistently. A three year old is still largely ambidexterous. So things are just as good forwards as backwards. I taught all my kids (7 of them) to read, and I taught most of them early, around 4 or so. Some of them tended to reverse words like these, but I had a particular technique I used to teach them to read from left to right. From the very beginning, I had them READ from left to right, because I always asked them to identify the letter they were learning in this order. I pointed to that letter. I used phonics to teach them, and began by pointing to one letter and saying its name, and then we found all of them in a book. At first, when they pointed to the letters themselves, they did it in any order at all. Sometimes they missed some of them and went back to them. A 3 year old who can read on the third grade level is emphatically NOT dyslexic! My advice would be to continue to read together, and have fun, and do it without pressure, as he is interested. Although it is not customary for a child to read at such an early age, I see no harm in it, because as long as it is done with love and without pressure, the child has the basis for doing other early learning, and if he continues to do so, will ultimately be smarter than most of us. The pitfalls include putting him on display because he is a "prodigy", applying pressure, and failing to follow up by giving him other things to learn early. Most of the geniuses of the world (well, many of them, at least) had parents who are doing exactly what you are doing. Although teaching them early is not the ONLY way to achieve the goal of excellence, it is a good way. I have been watching the Suzuki scene for some time now. Suzuki as practiced in high-pressure Japan, where it originated, under ideal conditions results in young violinists of barely school age who are playing violin concertos, which are fairly advanced in difficulty. I have sat in an audience listening to some of these youngsters play and cried at the sheer beauty of one so young being able to do this. So often excellence is denied to the very young, who must content themselves with being inept at everything, with whatever this does to their spirits. However, I have also watched American Suzuki students drop violin while still children, never to take it up again, and I have watched them fail to learn to read music because it is a rote method of learning. One Suzuki student I know is incredibly tense and has been unable to learn some of the more advanced violin techniques which require relaxation. Her mother puts a lot of pressure on her, though she thinks she isn't. I am also told that most Suzuki students in Japan abandon the violin as adults. Japan is particularly bad about applying pressure. I think the key here is attitude. As long as the impetus for teaching a child to read comes from the child's desire (and there are ways to foster this successfully), and pressure is NOT applied, then it is a reasonable thing to do. The moment you begin to worry and to apply the pressure, even if you don't realize you are doing it, you are setting the child BACK, and he may never recover. Pat -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!300!3!Pat.Goltz Internet: Pat.Goltz@f3.n300.z1.fidonet.org