GE0013@SIUCVMB.BITNET (Roy Miller) (08/20/90)
Index Number: 9881 In a recent posting you asked Ann if she could use the VCO with a "Y" connector. Well, the new Illinois Relay Center has the VCO capability too, and I use it all the time. There is absolutely no problem using it with a "Y" connector with a voice phone on one side and a TDD on the other side. And, of course, both of the phones are active so you can either talk to the hearing recipient of your telephone call or type to the relay operator at any time. Works slick as a whistle. There is one problem with the VCO here in Illinois. For some unknown to me reason, once the VCO link is enabled if you talk too long without giving the other party a chance to say something then you are automatically cut off. I don't know why this happens, but suspect that it has to do with the technology being used by the relay operators. Some of that is proprietary so I am not sure if questions about the problem would produce technically acceptable answers from the telephone company. In any event, you quickly get into the habit of asking "can you hear me" to give the other party a chance to say something real quick. You mentioned that you were going to Washington for the ANSI A117 committee hearings. I know you are the SHHH representative on that committee, but I would like to know more about exactly what the committee does. If you get a little time, could you post an explanation of the makeup, functions, and legislative mandate of the committee. I would appreciate it greatly. Roy Miller The Professor Who Never Listens But Whose Eyes Hear A Lot
Jack.O'keeffe@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Jack O'keeffe) (08/25/90)
Index Number: 9969 RM> From: GE0013@SIUCVMB.BITNET (Roy Miller) RM> Message-ID: <13583@bunker.UUCP> Hi, Roy. RM> There is one problem with the VCO here in Illinois. For some RM> unknown to me reason, once the VCO link is enabled if you talk RM> too long without giving the other party a chance to say RM> something then you are automatically cut off. I don't know why RM> this happens, I think that happens because when you use voice instead of typing, you by-pass the relay operator. If the operator recieves nothing for an extended period, the system must time out. I hope we get our Pennsylvania relay up and running on schedule next month. RM> You mentioned that you were going to Washington for the ANSI RM> A117 committee hearings. I know you are the SHHH RM> representative on that committee, but I would like to know more RM> about exactly what the committee does. If you get a little RM> time, could you post an explanation of the makeup, functions, RM> and legislative mandate of the committee. Quick answer, Roy, to a question that deserves better. ANSI is the American National Standards Institute. Like all ANSI standards, A117 is a "voluntary" standard. There is no legislative mandate unless and until the standard is adopted or "referenced" by some governmental body having the authority to legislate. The committee's charge is writing and maintaining ANSI A-117.1, the "American National Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities". This standard is adopted by reference in a few building codes, and is expected to receive somewhat more respect with the passage of ADA. Your question re makeup of the committee is most significant. My prior A117 experience had been with subcommittees or "Task Forces" which were made up primarily of persons with disabilities or their advocates. The atmosphere there was supportive and cooperative. To my dismay, I find that this makeup does not extend to the full committee. There the disability advocates are outnumbered by 3:1 in the voting membership. Some others represent facility owners (who don't want to spend money on access), manufacturers of various hardware products and fixtures (who wish to minimize impact on their operations), architects (who think they know our needs much better than we do ourselves), and building code officials (who seem to feel a need to defend their turf). The parenthetical expressions above my personal perceptions. I hope the reality is more encouraging. Results in the committee were mixed. We won some and we lost some, but it's not over 'till it's over. If you'd like to know more, we can continue this via netmail. Good to hear from you. ... Jack. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!26!Jack.O'keeffe Internet: Jack.O'keeffe@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org