James.Womack@f14.n300.z1.fidonet.org (James Womack) (11/19/90)
Index Number: 11822 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] Ann, Not all interpreters mouth while signing. It depends on who they are signing for and under what circumstances. Often, they do mouth, but infallibly. Lipreading has its place for deaf people who have an aptitude for it or are post lingually deaf. I never said it couldn't be taught. If a deaf person has enough residual hearing or has a demonstratable aptitude for learning lipreading skills, I would be at the forefront of advocating that person to receive such instruction. Otherwise, I strongly feel one is wasting his/her life when the time could be used for teaching something of more practical use. I am post lingually deaf but cannot lipread worth a darn. I just never got the hang of it. But on the other hand, I never really received long term training in that area. I kind of rushed through school two years after becoming deaf. I only got two years of high school under my belt before entering Gallaudet. For a discussion like your and mine, something must be taken into account. Deafness involves more than a clinical state. It is a state of being. In my case, I am clinically, culturally and socially deaf. This means I am deaf from a medical standpoint, and deaf in my sense of cultural identity in that I perceive myself as a deafie (as do most other culturally deaf people). I associate mainly with other deaf people who view themselves and are active members of the deaf community. In short, I have a deaf mindset. On this basis, your views and mine will stand in obvious contrast. Among deafies, and no offense meant here, we view persons like you as deaf with hearing minds. In that sense, to us, you are not really deaf. Bear with me a bit, I am trying to clarify some stuff I will be focusing on in a moment. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!300!14!James.Womack Internet: James.Womack@f14.n300.z1.fidonet.org