James.Womack@f14.n300.z1.fidonet.org (James Womack) (11/19/90)
Index Number: 11824 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] As an educator, I have watched SEE abandoned by kids who were instructed with it. As a college teacher, I have seen pre- lingually deaf people express bitterness at the waste of time and their lives by parents and educators who insisted on a phonetically based sign system. Some even break down into tears. I watch how these same people gravitate to ASL over time. That is not to say SEE has NO value and Oralism has no value. It is to say that the low academic level of most deaf people is due to a stubborn refusal of educators to accept the fundamental fact that the deaf child cannot HEAR a spoken language or hears it only in fragments. These educators stubbornly insist on denying the deaf child a first language to have some kind of foundation on which to build. SEE and Sign English are not true languages. They are manual codes of a phonetic system; there, they are not natural. That is why anyone who bothers to look, will see the following: Most deaf children sign stiffly (trying to be precise in English use and usually failing miserably). Their thinking is not clearly expressed. Within two or three years after graduating, they switch to ASL and sign with confidence. I see it again and again. But only now is that phenomenon finally is being researched. ASL is under no circumstances the cause of deaf people's low academic achievement. Indeed, it has historically been denied its proper place in educating the deaf. Every non-native speaker of English had a first language as a basis for associative learning of English. Yet so-called educators of the deaf have historically refused to allow the deaf child that same fundamental need. It is absurd. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!300!14!James.Womack Internet: James.Womack@f14.n300.z1.fidonet.org