Dan.Kysor@f11.n203.z1.fidonet.org (Dan Kysor) (10/05/90)
Index Number: 10917 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] hi grant. i was interested to hear that you run a reading service and had a couple of questions for you. first, why does it seem that the audio on so many of these services is too low, i.e., BSB & Audiovision. Also, it seems that these services can never quite get rid of the bleed over from the master fm station (sca main channel) -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!203!11!Dan.Kysor Internet: Dan.Kysor@f11.n203.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/10/90)
Index Number: 11003 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] One of the most interesting aspects of discussing Radio Reading Services is the dabatethat goes on as to the need for Radio Reading Services. One of the problems we have is that most of our listeners would like me to envest in some portable radiosk. To date I've not found any that were any good. A guy from Los Angeles keeps contacting me about buying from him but each time he talks to me he says, "When I passed through El Paso your service was really low power and week." Our Service is on one of the strongist towers in town. How relevent Radio Reading Services are I don't really know. I can tell you this they do cost a heck of a lot of money to operate, do not bring in any money to our facility, and if we don't get better response we might close ours down. It is really a budget burner. Grant -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/10/90)
Index Number: 11007 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] Thanks for your message. I just looked at it and am anwering you prety much off the top of my head. As no doubt you know the SCA channel is created by the generation of stareo. From what my engineer tells me, unless the system is hooked up correctly, there will be problems on both sides, the main channel, and the Radio Reading Service. Before I came to this one the channels were always overriding each other. In our case, I send our programming via phone line to the KTEP main Control room (our main transmitting facility) and from there they send it up via SCA at 185 megahurtz via mivrowave to the main transmitter where the signal is decoded back down to 67 magahurtz and transmitted to our SCA receivers at 67 megahurtz. The reason for this procedure is that it keeps KTEP's signal out of the way of ours and vice versa. The down side of this is that we loose a lot of audio quality. I plan on buying the latist Moseley SCA generator out that claims to clean up some of the bad audio. I have our Limiter-Compresser set so that the recovery rate is quite fast so that very little of the main channel ever ever gets in the way of my audeo. The side effect of that is we get quite a breathing effect on the audio output but I'd rather have than than NPR's All Things Considered int he background. One other factor that can cause bleed over is the fact that the higher the modulation of the main channel the more bleedover there is going to be. Fortunately our main channel is primarely clasical and our engineer doesn't believe in much processing therefore our Radio Reading Service is prety cleen but a little muffled. If you have any other questions don't hesitate to ask! Hope I've been some help. Grant -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!381!9.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/10/90)
Index Number: 11008 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] I had one more thought. If you find that your Radio Reading Service's output is to low, bring it to the attention of the director and ask that person to talk to the engineer about it. One of the reasons that you are getting bleedover is that your modulation is low. Suggest that they beef it up with a Limiter-compresser or maybe the one thathave could be adjusted to bring up the signal. Maybe yours ishooked up where the signals are corssoing each other and noone is aware. We weren't until the Englieer got so disgusted with the whistle we were creating in his main signel he pulled out the instructions on how to set up a SCA channel and there we found the problem. Try some of these things. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!381!9.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org
Steve.Bauer@f6.n291.z1.fidonet.org (Steve Bauer) (10/10/90)
Index Number: 11045 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] I am pleased to see you are taking a real interest in providing a quality Radio Reading Service. As a former broadcaster, it makes me ill to listen to the Wichita Radio Reading Service and the poor job they do. No screening of readers, bad audio, programs running late or not at all, symulcast with the main channel, broadcast of NPR programming and hours of dead air ... I was on the board and tried to get them to spruce things up, but the rich old ladies pushed me out. How dare a blind person have a brain and try to have positive input. Others who have tried have also been pushed off the board. There are even a small number of us who have talked about what it would take to start another service, but don't have the bucks to do it now. So we suffer and listen to crap. Keep up the good work and make that service shine. Steve/ -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!291!6!Steve.Bauer Internet: Steve.Bauer@f6.n291.z1.fidonet.org
David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (David Andrews) (10/10/90)
Index Number: 11058 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] DK> hi grant. i was interested to hear that you run a reading DK> service and had a couple of questions for you. DK> first, why does it seem that the audio on so many of these DK> services is too low, i.e., BSB & Audiovision. Also, it seems DK> that these services can never quite get rid of the bleed over DK> from the master fm station (sca main channel) While Grant will probably answer this, I will jump in here too. I have run three different radion reading services and was involved in the field for ten years. Both properties you describe, low volume and crosstalk are the nature of the beast. They are somewhat inherent in the sub-carrier signals that these stations use. You can minimize crosstalk tomewhat by adjusting your antenna. It will also vary somewhat from day to day, depending on the weather and how well the transmitter is adjusted. Both situations can be minimized by the main carrier by boosting the level at which the sub-carrier is injected into the main carrier signal. Many broadcasters run it on the low side because they are afraid the sub-carrier will leak into the main carrier, however, this fear is mostly groundless. You could contact your reading service and/or their main carrier station and beat on them to increase the injection level of the sub- carrier. If memory serves me correctly, don't you live in the Sacramento area. I know they were using a TV SAP carrier out there. I spent a lot of time with them back in 1984 or 1985 before they went on. I developed the first SAP audio service in New Jersey, before them. THE TV SAP has a very good signal, generally better then a FM sub-carrier, so if it is bad sounding, it is do to very conservative or bad engineering. David Andrews ... Your Sound Alternative -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews Internet: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (David Andrews) (10/10/90)
Index Number: 11059 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] GD> I plan on buying the GD> latist Moseley SCA generator out that claims to clean up some GD> of the bad audio. I have our Limiter-Compresser set so that GD> the recovery rate is quite fast so that very little of the GD> main channel ever ever gets in the way of my audeo. The side GD> effect of that is we get quite a breathing effect on the audio GD> output but I'd rather have than than NPR's All Things GD> Considered int he background. Grant, Most people feel that the best SCA Generator around is the SideKick from Modulation Sciences. It will make an audible difference in the quality of your signal. Most people use Moseley equipment for their studio to transmitter links, they are not as big a player in the SCA generator market. David Andrews ... Your Sound Alternative -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews Internet: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
William.Wilson@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (William Wilson) (10/13/90)
Index Number: 11086 DK> me was the reading service in san francisco used to spend a [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] DK> couple of hours a day reading the stock market reports; i must DK> say that with all my millions, i couldn't live without it!! Dan, A while back we discussed the service offered by many tv cable dompanies to their computer owning subscribers. Basically, at least here in Pittsburgh, it involves a one time cost of $100 that gets you something like a modem, that when attached to a comm port on the PC and to the cable, will allow you to access many, many items, such as newspapers, via the program they likewise supply. Although he doesn't call the board any more, we do have a blink in our area that uses this service with speech, and trust me, if he can do it, it must not be very difficult! As I recall, you can select those items you want to read, or even capture them to disk for later, and since there is no additional charge beyond the regular cable fees and the initial 100 bucks, it sure sounds like a good deal to me! Mark Senk, my good buddy and computer science major at Pitt who is so busy with his Assembly language class he can't find the time to call the board either, just ordered the service, so I'll let you know how it goes if nobody else does in the meantime. Heck, if it really is as nice as I imagine it, maybe I'll even part with a portion of my millions to get the service! Willie ... BlinkTalk, Dr. Deb and Silver in Pittsburgh! -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!William.Wilson Internet: William.Wilson@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Steve.Bauer@f6.n291.z1.fidonet.org (Steve Bauer) (10/17/90)
Index Number: 11149 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] You know it would really be slick if you could run a radio reading service on the type of system used by NOAA weather. This way, you'd have no bleed over and the audio response would be about the same. Radio's would be cheaper to buy and people could even use scanners and portable rigs. I don't think the cost would be that high either. Dreaming, dreaming dreaming. Then, you'd not be tied to an FM station and forced to be on when they are on or to follow their rules and regs. Steve/ -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!291!6!Steve.Bauer Internet: Steve.Bauer@f6.n291.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/17/90)
Index Number: 11165 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] In our particular Service we have found it to be quite expensive and the comments that we get from the listeners seem to reflect what you are saying. This is why I've thought that the talking newspaper would be better. Unfortunately the funding source I had for that decided to help us with the Technology Center which is fine with me I guess but as opposed to the Radio Reading Service it seems to me the Talking Newspaper could really serve a purpose. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/17/90)
Index Number: 11168 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] Due to severe budget cuts we had to envoke the assistence of In-Touch Networks to keep the radio reading service going except for the local papers. I'm not saying that's the best way but it is themost cost effective. My salary comes from the other program I'm running thus no salary for the director of Radio Reading, the readers are volunteers, and it all solved my bosses's problem of financing. Again I didn't say that's the best way but right now it is the only way for us. We have received our usual couple of grants that we depend on each year and I've been able to put money into sorely needed equipment. I think we will be able to go one more year that way the way thenew budget is shaping up. Grant -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/17/90)
Index Number: 11169 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] I to am an old broadcaster of about ten years experience and when I took over the Radio Reading Service here I felt that we could take a really good load of equipment tuned up, get some good programming, buy a feq assorted pieces of new equipment and we'd be rolling. Well my dreams didn't end up quite like my plans which seems to be the case. I was given a free hand but no money. This Radio Reading Service is run by The El Paso Lighthouse for the Blind and I came at a time when the Lighthouse was hitting bottom. I guess when I think back there are two improvements I made that have been the longist lasting. I already had a wonderful volunteer staff that most of I still have today but I scrownged up the money for another SCA demodulator and found an old SCA generator and we got our signal out of the way of the main channel. Long about that time I was hit with severe budget cuts so we went to In-Touch but that didn't end up being a bad thing at all. We produce four hours per day two hours in Spanish and two in English and the rest of the time we are In-Touch. All my radios are issued out, I don't have money for any more and I've got people knocking on the door. I can say I work hard to make what I have sound as good as possible and when a problem does come up I do try to fix it as soon as possible. I could do a lot more if I didn't have two or sometimes three other jobs and more money but I am pleased to say that we have at least from a technical stand point a good quality service for our listeners. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Walter.Siren.@p18.f5.n396.z1.fidonet.org (Walter Siren ) (10/23/90)
Index Number: 11210 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] SB> You know it would really be slick if you could run a radio reading SB> service on the type of system used by NOAA weather. This way, you'd SB> have no bleed over and the audio response would be about the same. SB> Radio's would be cheaper to buy and people could even use scanners SB> and portable rigs. I don't think the cost would be that high either. SB> SB> Dreaming, dreaming dreaming. Well, wake up, and move to New Orleans. We have our reading service on a regular fm channel in the public radio part of the fm broadcast band. We have no bleed over, and you can pick it up on a regular fm radio. It is really nice. Walter -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!396!5.18!Walter.Siren. Internet: Walter.Siren.@p18.f5.n396.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (10/23/90)
Index Number: 11222 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] Due to budget restraints we have to subwscribt to In-Touch for a good part of the broadcast day which is okay however they to spend a tremendous ammount of the time reading the stock quotes and also the sciences. I think they read more magazines on the sciences than about anything else. They sent out a letter to all of the known subscribers and I sent them back an ear full. I suggested that 1. they broadcast gener interest news and programming on the sattelite service and keep the New York material runnning only in the tristate area and 2. that they try to increase the variety of what they are reading instead of homing in on one subject such as the sciences. All in all or all things considered In-Touch operating as both a Radio Reading Service and a Sattelity System does a great job and if I were in their position I'm not sure I could do nearly as well but I had to get my two cents worth in. Grant -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!381!9.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org
David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (David Andrews) (10/26/90)
Index Number: 11307 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] GD> Due to budget restraints we have to subwscribt to In-Touch for GD> a good part of the broadcast day which is okay however they to GD> spend a tremendous ammount of the time reading the stock quotes GD> and also the sciences. I think they read more magazines on the GD> sciences than about anything else. They sent out a letter to GD> all of the known subscribers and I sent them back an ear full. GD> I suggested that 1. they broadcast gener interest news and GD> programming on the sattelite service and keep the New York GD> material runnning only in the tristate area and 2. that they GD> try to increase the variety of what they are reading instead of GD> homing in on one subject such as the sciences. All in all or GD> all things considered In-Touch operating as both a Radio GD> Reading Service and a Sattelity System does a great job and if GD> I were in their position I'm not sure I could do nearly as well GD> but I had to get my two cents worth in. Grant Grant, My opinion of in Touch is not as high as yours, but it has nothing to do with subject matter. For a service in the largest city in the United States, I find the quality of their readers to be very spotty. They have a large pool and should be able to do better. We had much better readers when I was in Chicago. Further, their timing, openings closings etc., are very ragged and unprofessional. For a satellite service, they should hit the top of the hour with program changes, and they don't. David Andrews ... Your Sound Alternative -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews Internet: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (David Andrews) (10/26/90)
Index Number: 11308 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] GD> Is WRBH still on the air? I'd heard that there was a real GD> shakeup there sometime ago and never heard if things got back GD> together again. It is a shame that Doctor McClain never was GD> able to get the sattelite uplink going so that WRBH could have GD> done something similar to In-Touch. WRBH was certainly one of a GD> kind. Grant There are at least two other Reading Services on satellite now, the state networks in Kansas and Minnesota. I know that Minnesota has encouraged people to use theirs, but I don't know if anyone has. It is havily into books. David Andrews ... Your Sound Alternative -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews Internet: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
senk2@unix.cis.pitt.edu (Mark Senk) (10/31/90)
Index Number: 11429 Here is my quick review of the Innfo Cypher for news and stocks via cable: If you are served by a TCI cable company and get CNN, phone 800-7PC-NEWS for a brochure about X*press service. Ask for Steve. The stories are transmiited along with the closed captioning info. They are for the most part short features and news headlines that you might see in USA Today, Knight Ritter, Copley News Service etc. The up-to-the -minute stock quotes will cost you about $25 more a month. The stories cover a range of topics with the emphasis on business and finance. You can choose to block certain categories you do not like or pick only those that match the 16 keywords you have defined. The menus use highlight bars and Business Vision works well after using mode bw80 first. You move around with the cursor keys and should delete a story once read since the info is held in your ram. Once you have filled it, no new info comes in. It seems like a good value for the one time price. The advantage I see is reading what you want when you want it. If I can answer any other questions, write via e-mail or phone 412-681-4543 some evening. Mark Senk senk2@unix.cis.pitt.edu
Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (11/02/90)
Index Number: 11470 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] You are so right about the quality of readers. In my letter to the President I also brought up the fact that they should use an hourly identification at the top of each hour. One thing I have seen though is that since they have gotten a new manager in the past six months they are much responsive to the subscribers and even seem eager to hear from us. I guess the reason I in spite of all have a high opinion of In-Touch is that i know from broadcast experience both on the commercial side and the non-commercial side what it takes to keep something like that going. As I know you are aware of to keep that much broadcast material coming twenty four hours per day seven days per week depending on volunteers is a formatible task which they do well. I realize that on the sattelite service they are limited in technical quality by funds but sometime if you want me to get on my soapbox get me started on the In-Touch audio quality. That is for another message though. Grant -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!381!9.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org
David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (David Andrews) (12/01/90)
Index Number: 12107 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] GD> What is the actual name of the Radio Reading Service in GD> Minnesota? I made numerous calls to directory assistance in GD> both Mineapolis and St Paul and they had nothing close to any GD> name I'd heard it called. Help!!!! if you know. Thanks Grant Grant, The official name is the Radio Talking Book, or it actually may be the Minnesota Radio Talking book. You should be able to reach them either through State Services for the Blind, or the "communications Center." David Andrews ... Your Sound Alternative -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89!David.Andrews Internet: David.Andrews@f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org
cas@mtdcb.att.com (Cliff Stevens) (12/03/90)
Index Number: 12126 I'm sorry, but it seems like we are getting sloppy! I just read this article and nowhere did it have a reference to SCA. So maybe we could start reading and modifying the subject line when we followup? ------------ A man's gotta know his own limiyations! Dirty Harry Callahan Cliff Stevens MT1E228 att!cbnewsj!ncas (908)671-7292
Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (12/05/90)
Index Number: 12243 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] I was just curious did you get any results by contacting your Radio Reading Service main carrier? My engineer, now that theyjust put in some new equipment, has started cutting us down and we are sort of having a tussle aboutit. Don't know who will win! -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!381!9.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f9.n381.z1.fidonet.org
Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Grant Downey) (12/05/90)
Index Number: 12314 [This is from the Blink Talk Conference] Right now mine is to. I'll have to get after Ed and see what we can do about it. Seriously I think that that is always a running battle that SCA stations have with their main carriers. If you don't keep after them they will make the SCA lolwer and lower. t(I thought when we installed the right equipment that thints would be more consistant. What happens to me is that it gets low and I'll call him up to talk to him about it and am informed that everything is okay. Of course when we hang up it pops back up to where it should be for a couple of weeks and then back tothe same thing. Sound familiar? -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!89.0!Grant.Downey Internet: Grant.Downey@p0.f89.n129.z1.fidonet.org