Rob.Carr@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org (Rob Carr) (01/26/91)
Index Number: 13238 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] JC> Good for you in using sign language. But does your hospital JC> call in a *professional* sign language interpreter as soon as JC> possible? Last night, I called a hospital on the radio, and they didn't answer. I called medic command on the radio, and requested a message be relayed to the hospital that they would need to call PHSDS for a translator. On arrival, no effort had been made to call. The hospital personnel recognized the person once we were there for a while, and apparently are used to communicating by writing. They asked if I could stay around in case they ran into a problem. I explained that I was not a professional translator, and that everybody would be better off if a pro were called in. I excused myself because I had to go on another call, and left. If it had been life and death, I wouldn't have called back in until they had someone on scene, but it was a minor problem and they already had all the answers they needed. Maybe I've been reading about codependants too much, but I feel that the only way to get the point to the hospital was to leave them high and dry. I doubt they learned. *&^%. ... Subscribe to The Journal of Disasters in Emergency Medicine: $8.00/yr -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!129!26!Rob.Carr Internet: Rob.Carr@f26.n129.z1.fidonet.org
Jay.Croft@p0.f147.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Jay Croft) (02/05/91)
Index Number: 13492 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] The patient has the *legal right* to a competent interpreter, if requested--by the patient. A similar situation happened some months ago when I brought a deaf person to a local hospital. I sent off a stiff letter to the president of the hospital, and received a rather self-serving reply from the chief of emergency medicine. Next time I'll take my Blue Cross card elsewhere. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!109!147.0!Jay.Croft Internet: Jay.Croft@p0.f147.n109.z1.fidonet.org
Ann.Stalnaker@p0.f14.n385.z1.fidonet.org (Ann Stalnaker) (02/05/91)
Index Number: 13504 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] > The patient has the *legal right* to a competent interpreter, > if requested--by the patient. > > A similar situation happened some months ago when I brought > a deaf person to a local hospital. I sent off a stiff > letter to the president of the hospital, and received > a rather self-serving reply from the chief of emergency > medicine. Next time I'll take my Blue Cross card elsewhere. Why not try to educate the personnel at this hospital, Jay? I think everyone would benefit if some of us advised them on how helpful they could be. I realize it can be very frustrating but it sure can be rewarding when you see what you have accomplished. Perhaps you might try to contact the hospital administrator and see what can be worked out. I believe a lot of hospital personnel are being trained in sign language to ensure there are no communication barriers, at least they are in several states in the Southwest. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!385!14.0!Ann.Stalnaker Internet: Ann.Stalnaker@p0.f14.n385.z1.fidonet.org
Jay.Croft@p0.f147.n109.z1.fidonet.org (Jay Croft) (02/09/91)
Index Number: 13658 [This is from the Silent Talk Conference] My letter included an offer to work on training. This, of course, was not addressed in the reply. As I said, the letter was very self-serving. -- Uucp: ..!{decvax,oliveb}!bunker!hcap!hnews!109!147.0!Jay.Croft Internet: Jay.Croft@p0.f147.n109.z1.fidonet.org