jcp@brl-tgr.ARPA (Joe Pistritto <jcp>) (09/09/84)
Yes Discovery is lighter than either of the first two orbiters (which are approximately the same weight). Some of the weight reduction was made by replacing the silica 'tile' surface in some areas with thinner, larger molded plates made of metal and/or composite materials. (test plates of this material were flown earlier on Challenger). The upper surface of Discover (white area) has quite a bit of this. Also, the wing structures have a few less internal struts, in non-critical areas. Some weight reduction has also been achieved thru use of different materials for the OMS pods, I believe. The total weight reduction of the orbiter is on the order of 1500 lbs. Of course, all shuttle missions recently have used the lightweight external tank, (unpainted), which shaved off 3000lbs all by itself. The idea is to increase launch payload. For instance, only Discovery and the next orbiter (Endeavor?) will be able to launch the max payload capacity ~70K lbs. The first Discovery flight had a payload of ~45K lbs I believe. (Three satellites, which didn't come back down, plus the extensible solar array assembly, which did). Also, the flight instrumentation for Discovery is simpler, (the development instrumentation having never been installed). I believe Discovery has 'head-up' displays for the commander and pilot, (the 'pilot' sits in the right seat), unlike the previous orbiters, which are being retrofitted for this. (Challenger will have them on the next mission, I believe) -JCP-
brian@sequent.UUCP (09/13/84)
A few days ago, in an article about Discovery, Roger Noe mentioned that she is lighter than her predecessors. I am curious how they achieved this and if the weight reduction affords Discovery a larger payload, or if it will be used to increase safety margins or some- thing. Brian M. Godfrey
dsmith@proper.UUCP (David Smith) (09/15/84)
{Line eater bug, what line eate%&$@#Q$*^%$#*%$#%..$
Portions of the Discovery (the OMS pods, the bay doors?) are covered
with a heat resistant felt. I saw a quickie bit about it on TV.
Apparently, the felt is the same type used to make tennis balls.
David Smith @ Proper Unixeder@ssc-vax.UUCP (Dani Eder) (09/17/84)
[17 Sep 1984]
These figures are from the "Shuttle Systems Weight and Performance"
JSC-09095-73, Johnson Space Center, NASA; 22 June 1983, page 4-5
Orbiter Weight
------- -------
102(Columbia) 154 633 lb
099(Challenger) 148 189
103(Discovery) 147 452
104(Atlantis) 147 452
These are the 'inert weights', with no fluids or propellants
in any of the tanks.
Dani Eder / Boeing Aerospace Company / ssc-vax!eder